Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electroencephalographic Brain Dynamics Following Manually Responded Visual Targets

Open access
Makeig, Scott, Delorme, Arnaud, Westerfield, Marissa, Jung, Tzyy-Ping, Townsend, Jeanne, Courchesne, Eric, Sejnowski, Terrence J·2004·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Scalp-recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) signals produced by partial synchronization of cortical field activity mix locally synchronous electrical activities of many cortical areas. Analysis of event-related EEG signals typically assumes that poststimulus potentials emerge out of a flat baseline. Signals associated with a particular type of cognitive event are then assessed by averaging data from each scalp channel across trials, producing averaged event-related potentials (ERPs). ERP averaging, however, filters out much of the information about cortical dynamics available in the unaveraged data trials. Here, we studied the dynamics of cortical electrical activity while subjects detected and manually responded to visual targets, viewing signals retained in ERP averages not as responses of an otherwise silent system but as resulting from event-related alterations in ongoing EEG processes. We applied infomax independent component analysis to parse the dynamics of the unaveraged 31-channel EEG signals into maximally independent processes, then clustered the resulting processes across subjects by similarities in their scalp maps and activity power spectra, identifying nine classes of EEG processes with distinct spatial distributions and event-related dynamics. Coupled two-cycle postmotor theta bursts followed button presses in frontal midline and somatomotor clusters, while the broad postmotor "P300" positivity summed distinct contributions from several classes of frontal, parietal, and occipital processes. The observed event-related changes in local field activities, within and between cortical areas, may serve to modulate the strength of spike-based communication between cortical areas to update attention, expectancy, memory, and motor preparation during and after target recognition and speeded responding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020176

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Ardekani, 2002, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 14, 347, 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00137-4 · DOI
  2. Amari, 1998, Neural Comput, 10, 251, 10.1162/089976698300017746 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Anemueller, 2003, Neural Netw, 16, 1311, 10.1016/j.neunet.2003.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Baillet, 2001, IEEE Signal Proc Mag, 18, 14, 10.1109/79.962275 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Caplan, 2003, J Neurosci, 23, 4726, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-11-04726.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Csicsvari, 2003, Neuron, 23, 311, 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01169-8 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dale, 1993, J Cogn Neurosci, 5, 162, 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Delorme, 2002, Neurocomputing, 44–46, 1057, 10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00415-0 · DOI
  9. Dien, 2003, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 17, 637, 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00188-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ebmeier, 1995, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 95, 434, 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00173-5 · DOI
  11. Elbert, 1987, J Psychophysiol, 4, 317
  12. Ford, 1994, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 90, 214, 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90093-0 · DOI
  13. Forss, 2001, Rev Neurol (Paris), 157, 816
  14. Fries, 2001, Science, 291, 1560, 10.1126/science.1055465 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gevins, 1997, Cereb Cortex, 7, 374, 10.1093/cercor/7.4.374 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Giesbrecht, 2003, NeuroImage, 19, 496, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00162-9 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Halgren, 1980, Science, 210, 803, 10.1126/science.7434000 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Halgren, 1995a, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 94, 191, 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00259-N · DOI · Paper page
  19. Halgren, 1995b, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 94, 229, 10.1016/0013-4694(95)98475-N · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hari, 1997, Int J Psychophysiol, 26, 51, 10.1016/S0167-8760(97)00755-1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hasselmo, 2002, Neural Netw, 15, 689, 10.1016/S0893-6080(02)00057-6 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Holroyd, 1998, Neurosci Lett, 242, 65, 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00035-4 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hupe, 2001, J Neurophysiol, 85, 134, 10.1152/jn.2001.85.1.134 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ikeda, 1996, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 98, 206, 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00239-1 · DOI
  25. Jung, 2000a, Psychophysiology, 37, 163, 10.1111/1469-8986.3720163 · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720163 · Paper page
  26. Jung, 2000b, Clin Neurophysiol, 111, 1745, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00386-2 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Jung, 2001a, P IEEE, 89, 1107, 10.1109/5.939827 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Jung, 2001b, Hum Brain Mapp, 14, 166, 10.1002/hbm.1050 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Klopp, 2000, Hum Brain Mapp, 11, 286, 10.1002/1097-0193(200012)11:4<286::AID-HBM80>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  30. Knight, 1989, Brain Res, 502, 109, 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90466-6 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kranczioch, 2003, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 17, 177, 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00092-2 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lee, 2000, Comput Math Appl, 39, 1, 10.1016/S0898-1221(00)00101-2 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Luu, 2001, Clin Neurophysiol, 112, 1295, 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00559-4 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Makeig, 1993, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 86, 283, 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90110-H · DOI · Paper page
  35. Makeig, 1993, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 86, 23, 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90064-3 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Makeig, 1997, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 94, 10979, 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10979 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Makeig, 1999a, J Neurosci, 19, 2665, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02665.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Makeig, 1999b, Philos T Roy Soc B, 354, 1135, 10.1098/rstb.1999.0469 · DOI
  39. Makeig, 2004, Trends Cogn Sci, 8, 204, 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Manthey, 2003, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 15, 296, 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00201-X · DOI
  41. McArthur, 1999, Neuroreport, 10, 3691, 10.1097/00001756-199911260-00042 · DOI
  42. Mizuki, 1980, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 49, 345, 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90229-1 · DOI
  43. Moores, 2003, Hum Brain Mapp, 18, 53, 10.1002/hbm.10073 · DOI
  44. Pfurtscheller, 1977, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 42, 817, 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90235-8 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Pfurtscheller, 2000, Clin Neurophysiol, 111, 1873, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00428-4 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Polich, 2003, Brain Topogr, 15, 141, 10.1023/A:1022637732495 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Potts, 2001, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 11, 147, 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00075-6 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Potts, 1998, Biol Psychiatry, 15, 982, 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00223-6 · DOI
  49. Rockstroh, 1996, Biol Psychol, 43, 41, 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05175-9 · DOI
  50. Ruchkin, 1990, Psychophysiology, 27, 157, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb00367.x · DOI
  51. Ruchsow, 2002, Neurosci Lett, 14, 203, 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00288-4 · DOI
  52. Salinas, 2001, Nat Rev Neurosci, 2, 539, 10.1038/35086012 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Seidenbecher, 2003, Science, 301, 846, 10.1126/science.1085818 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Shima, 1998, Science, 282, 1335, 10.1126/science.282.5392.1335 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Simson, 1977, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 43, 864, 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90009-8 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Smith, 1990, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 76, 235, 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90018-F · DOI · Paper page
  57. Soltani, 2001, Crit Rev Neurobiol, 14, 199
  58. Sutton, 1965, Science, 150, 1187, 10.1126/science.150.3700.1187 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Townsend, 1994, J Cogn Neurosci, 6, 220, 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.3.220 · DOI
  60. Uchida, 2003, J Clin Neurosci, 10, 371, 10.1016/S0967-5868(03)00025-0 · DOI
  61. Ullsperger, 2003, J Neurosci, 23, 4308, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-10-04308.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  62. von Stein, 2000, Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 97, 14748, 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14748 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Worden, 2000, J Neurosci, 20, RC63, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-06-j0002.2000 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Makeig, S., Delorme, A., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J.
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2004-06-15
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
e176
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W1967970656
Cited by
357
References
8
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.