The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electroencephalographic Brain Dynamics Following Manually Responded Visual Targets
Open accessAbstract
Scalp-recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) signals produced by partial synchronization of cortical field activity mix locally synchronous electrical activities of many cortical areas. Analysis of event-related EEG signals typically assumes that poststimulus potentials emerge out of a flat baseline. Signals associated with a particular type of cognitive event are then assessed by averaging data from each scalp channel across trials, producing averaged event-related potentials (ERPs). ERP averaging, however, filters out much of the information about cortical dynamics available in the unaveraged data trials. Here, we studied the dynamics of cortical electrical activity while subjects detected and manually responded to visual targets, viewing signals retained in ERP averages not as responses of an otherwise silent system but as resulting from event-related alterations in ongoing EEG processes. We applied infomax independent component analysis to parse the dynamics of the unaveraged 31-channel EEG signals into maximally independent processes, then clustered the resulting processes across subjects by similarities in their scalp maps and activity power spectra, identifying nine classes of EEG processes with distinct spatial distributions and event-related dynamics. Coupled two-cycle postmotor theta bursts followed button presses in frontal midline and somatomotor clusters, while the broad postmotor "P300" positivity summed distinct contributions from several classes of frontal, parietal, and occipital processes. The observed event-related changes in local field activities, within and between cortical areas, may serve to modulate the strength of spike-based communication between cortical areas to update attention, expectancy, memory, and motor preparation during and after target recognition and speeded responding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Self-citationAn Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses
Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066893 · Cited by 1,884
Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066168 · Cited by 1,630
Self-citationStimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man
Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(75)90003-6 · Cited by 1,012
Self-citationHuman theta oscillations exhibit task dependence during virtual maze navigation
Kahana, M. J., Sekuler, R., Caplan, J. B., Kirschen, M., & Madsen, J. R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21645 · Cited by 649
A neural circuit for circadian regulation of arousal
Aston-Jones, G., Chen, S., Zhu, Y., & Oshinsky, M. L. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/89522 · Cited by 632
Luu, P., Tucker, D. M., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.031 · Cited by 545
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- Ardekani, 2002, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 14, 347, 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00137-4 · DOI
- Amari, 1998, Neural Comput, 10, 251, 10.1162/089976698300017746 · DOI · Paper page
- Anemueller, 2003, Neural Netw, 16, 1311, 10.1016/j.neunet.2003.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Baillet, 2001, IEEE Signal Proc Mag, 18, 14, 10.1109/79.962275 · DOI · Paper page
- Caplan, 2003, J Neurosci, 23, 4726, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-11-04726.2003 · DOI · Paper page
- Csicsvari, 2003, Neuron, 23, 311, 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01169-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Dale, 1993, J Cogn Neurosci, 5, 162, 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162 · DOI · Paper page
- Delorme, 2002, Neurocomputing, 44–46, 1057, 10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00415-0 · DOI
- Dien, 2003, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 17, 637, 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00188-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Ebmeier, 1995, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 95, 434, 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00173-5 · DOI
- Elbert, 1987, J Psychophysiol, 4, 317
- Ford, 1994, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 90, 214, 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90093-0 · DOI
- Forss, 2001, Rev Neurol (Paris), 157, 816
- Fries, 2001, Science, 291, 1560, 10.1126/science.1055465 · DOI · Paper page
- Gevins, 1997, Cereb Cortex, 7, 374, 10.1093/cercor/7.4.374 · DOI · Paper page
- Giesbrecht, 2003, NeuroImage, 19, 496, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00162-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Halgren, 1980, Science, 210, 803, 10.1126/science.7434000 · DOI · Paper page
- Halgren, 1995a, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 94, 191, 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00259-N · DOI · Paper page
- Halgren, 1995b, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 94, 229, 10.1016/0013-4694(95)98475-N · DOI · Paper page
- Hari, 1997, Int J Psychophysiol, 26, 51, 10.1016/S0167-8760(97)00755-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Hasselmo, 2002, Neural Netw, 15, 689, 10.1016/S0893-6080(02)00057-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Holroyd, 1998, Neurosci Lett, 242, 65, 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00035-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Hupe, 2001, J Neurophysiol, 85, 134, 10.1152/jn.2001.85.1.134 · DOI · Paper page
- Ikeda, 1996, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 98, 206, 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00239-1 · DOI
- Jung, 2000a, Psychophysiology, 37, 163, 10.1111/1469-8986.3720163 · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720163 · Paper page
- Jung, 2000b, Clin Neurophysiol, 111, 1745, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00386-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Jung, 2001a, P IEEE, 89, 1107, 10.1109/5.939827 · DOI · Paper page
- Jung, 2001b, Hum Brain Mapp, 14, 166, 10.1002/hbm.1050 · DOI · Paper page
- Klopp, 2000, Hum Brain Mapp, 11, 286, 10.1002/1097-0193(200012)11:4<286::AID-HBM80>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
- Knight, 1989, Brain Res, 502, 109, 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90466-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Kranczioch, 2003, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 17, 177, 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00092-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, 2000, Comput Math Appl, 39, 1, 10.1016/S0898-1221(00)00101-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Luu, 2001, Clin Neurophysiol, 112, 1295, 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00559-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Makeig, 1993, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 86, 283, 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90110-H · DOI · Paper page
- Makeig, 1993, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 86, 23, 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90064-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Makeig, 1997, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 94, 10979, 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10979 · DOI · Paper page
- Makeig, 1999a, J Neurosci, 19, 2665, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02665.1999 · DOI · Paper page
- Makeig, 1999b, Philos T Roy Soc B, 354, 1135, 10.1098/rstb.1999.0469 · DOI
- Makeig, 2004, Trends Cogn Sci, 8, 204, 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Manthey, 2003, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 15, 296, 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00201-X · DOI
- McArthur, 1999, Neuroreport, 10, 3691, 10.1097/00001756-199911260-00042 · DOI
- Mizuki, 1980, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 49, 345, 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90229-1 · DOI
- Moores, 2003, Hum Brain Mapp, 18, 53, 10.1002/hbm.10073 · DOI
- Pfurtscheller, 1977, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 42, 817, 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90235-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Pfurtscheller, 2000, Clin Neurophysiol, 111, 1873, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00428-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Polich, 2003, Brain Topogr, 15, 141, 10.1023/A:1022637732495 · DOI · Paper page
- Potts, 2001, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 11, 147, 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00075-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Potts, 1998, Biol Psychiatry, 15, 982, 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00223-6 · DOI
- Rockstroh, 1996, Biol Psychol, 43, 41, 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05175-9 · DOI
- Ruchkin, 1990, Psychophysiology, 27, 157, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb00367.x · DOI
- Ruchsow, 2002, Neurosci Lett, 14, 203, 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00288-4 · DOI
- Salinas, 2001, Nat Rev Neurosci, 2, 539, 10.1038/35086012 · DOI · Paper page
- Seidenbecher, 2003, Science, 301, 846, 10.1126/science.1085818 · DOI · Paper page
- Shima, 1998, Science, 282, 1335, 10.1126/science.282.5392.1335 · DOI · Paper page
- Simson, 1977, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 43, 864, 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90009-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, 1990, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 76, 235, 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90018-F · DOI · Paper page
- Soltani, 2001, Crit Rev Neurobiol, 14, 199
- Sutton, 1965, Science, 150, 1187, 10.1126/science.150.3700.1187 · DOI · Paper page
- Townsend, 1994, J Cogn Neurosci, 6, 220, 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.3.220 · DOI
- Uchida, 2003, J Clin Neurosci, 10, 371, 10.1016/S0967-5868(03)00025-0 · DOI
- Ullsperger, 2003, J Neurosci, 23, 4308, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-10-04308.2003 · DOI · Paper page
- von Stein, 2000, Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 97, 14748, 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14748 · DOI · Paper page
- Worden, 2000, J Neurosci, 20, RC63, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-06-j0002.2000 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510 · Cited by 1,678
Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement
Oken, B. S., Salinsky, M. C., & Elsas, S. M. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.017 · Cited by 887
Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory
Onton, J., Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.014 · Cited by 850
Self-citationLuu, P., Tucker, D. M., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.031 · Cited by 545
Self-citationWhat does phase information of oscillatory brain activity tell us about cognitive processes?
Sauseng, P., & Klimesch, W. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.03.014 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Makeig, S., Delorme, A., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2004-06-15
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e176
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W1967970656
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.