The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Host Gut Motility Promotes Competitive Exclusion within a Model Intestinal Microbiota
Open accessAbstract
The gut microbiota is a complex consortium of microorganisms with the ability to influence important aspects of host health and development. Harnessing this "microbial organ" for biomedical applications requires clarifying the degree to which host and bacterial factors act alone or in combination to govern the stability of specific lineages. To address this issue, we combined bacteriological manipulation and light sheet fluorescence microscopy to monitor the dynamics of a defined two-species microbiota within a vertebrate gut. We observed that the interplay between each population and the gut environment produces distinct spatiotemporal patterns. As a consequence, one species dominates while the other experiences sudden drops in abundance that are well fit by a stochastic mathematical model. Modeling revealed that direct bacterial competition could only partially explain the observed phenomena, suggesting that a host factor is also important in shaping the community. We hypothesized the host determinant to be gut motility, and tested this mechanism by measuring colonization in hosts with enteric nervous system dysfunction due to a mutation in the ret locus, which in humans is associated with the intestinal motility disorder known as Hirschsprung disease. In mutant hosts we found reduced gut motility and, confirming our hypothesis, robust coexistence of both bacterial species. This study provides evidence that host-mediated spatial structuring and stochastic perturbation of communities can drive bacterial population dynamics within the gut, and it reveals a new facet of the intestinal host-microbe interface by demonstrating the capacity of the enteric nervous system to influence the microbiota. Ultimately, these findings suggest that therapeutic strategies targeting the intestinal ecosystem should consider the dynamic physical nature of the gut environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease
Round, J. L., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2009) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2515 · Cited by 5,029
Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions
Nicholson, J. K., Holmes, E., Kinross, J., Burcelin, R., Gibson, G., Jia, W., & Pettersson, S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223813 · Cited by 4,760
Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis
Yano, J. M., Yu, K., Donaldson, G. P., Shastri, G. G., Ann, P., Ma, L., Nagler, C. R., Ismagilov, R. F., Mazmanian, S. K., & Hsiao, E. Y. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047 · Cited by 3,614
Cox, L. M., Yamanishi, S., Sohn, J., Alekseyenko, A. V., Leung, J. M., Cho, I., Kim, S. G., Li, H., Gao, Z., Mahana, D., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.052 · Cited by 1,859
Moving pictures of the human microbiome
Caporaso, J. G., Lauber, C. L., Costello, E. K., Berg-Lyons, D., Gonzalez, A., Stombaugh, J., Knights, D., Gajer, P., Ravel, J., Fierer, N., et al. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r50 · Cited by 1,138
Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales
David, L. A., Materna, A. C., Friedman, J., Campos-Baptista, M. I., Blackburn, M. C., Perrotta, A., Erdman, S. E., & Alm, E. J. (2014) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-7-r89 · Cited by 950 · cited 1×
“It is interesting to note that recent metagenomic analyses of human intestinal microbiota have uncovered signatures of sudden shifts in species composition, the origins of which remain unknown [15,46], perhaps indicating stochastic dynamics are widespread in natural intestinal systems.”
BackgroundComplex interactions among diet, gastrointestinal transit, and gut microbiota in humanized mice
Kashyap, P. C., Marcobal, A., Ursell, L. K., Larauche, M., Duboc, H., Earle, K. A., Sonnenburg, E. D., Ferreyra, J. A., Higginbottom, S. K., Million, M., et al. (2013) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.047 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Intestinal barrier and gut microbiota: Shaping our immune responses throughout life
Takiishi, T., Fenero, C. I. M., & Câmara, N. O. S. (2017) · Tissue Barriers · doi:10.1080/21688370.2017.1373208 · Cited by 1,009
The gut microbiome: connecting spatial organization to function
Tropini, C., Earle, K. A., Huang, K. C., & Sonnenburg, J. L. (2017) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.010 · Cited by 685
Why does the microbiome affect behaviour?
Johnson, K. V.-A., & Foster, K. R. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0014-3 · Cited by 333
Legrand, T. P. R. A., Wynne, J. W., Weyrich, L. S., & Oxley, A. P. A. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12375 · Cited by 265
The enteric nervous system promotes intestinal health by constraining microbiota composition
Rolig, A. S., Mittge, E. K., Ganz, J., Troll, J. V., Melancon, E., Wiles, T. J., Alligood, K., Stephens, W. Z., Eisen, J. S., & Guillemin, K. (2017) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000689 · Cited by 152
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiles, T. J., Jemielita, M., Baker, R. P., Schlomann, B. H., Logan, S. L., Ganz, J., Melancon, E., Eisen, J. S., Guillemin, K., & Parthasarathy, R.
- Venue
- PLOS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-07-26
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1002517
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2476829857
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Host Gut Motility Promotes Competitive Exclusion within a Model Intestinal Microbiota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002517
- The paper
- Wiles, T. J., Jemielita, M., Baker, R. P., Schlomann, B. H., Logan, S. L., Ganz, J., Melancon, E., Eisen, J. S., Guillemin, K., & Parthasarathy, R. (2016). Host Gut Motility Promotes Competitive Exclusion within a Model Intestinal Microbiota. PLOS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.