Cited by 451Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Complex interactions among diet, gastrointestinal transit, and gut microbiota in humanized mice

Open access
Kashyap, Purna C., Marcobal, Angela, Ursell, Luke K., Larauche, Muriel, Duboc, Henri, Earle, Kristen A., Sonnenburg, Erica D., Ferreyra, Jessica A. +7 more·2013·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims Diet has major effects on the intestinal microbiota, but the exact mechanisms that alter complex microbial communities have been difficult to elucidate. In addition to the direct influence that diet exerts on microbes, changes in microbiota composition and function can alter host functions such as gastrointestinal (GI) transit time, which in turn can further affect the microbiota.Methods We investigated the relationships among diet, GI motility, and the intestinal microbiota using mice that are germ-free (GF) or humanized (ex-GF mice colonized with human fecal microbiota).Results Analysis of gut motility revealed that humanized mice fed a standard polysaccharide-rich diet had faster GI transit and increased colonic contractility compared with GF mice. Humanized mice with faster transit due to administration of polyethylene glycol or a nonfermentable cellulose-based diet had similar changes in gut microbiota composition, indicating that diet can modify GI transit, which then affects the composition of the microbial community. However, altered transit in mice fed a diet of fermentable fructooligosaccharide indicates that diet can change gut microbial function, which can affect GI transit.Conclusions Based on studies in humanized mice, diet can affect GI transit through microbiota-dependent or microbiota-independent pathways, depending on the type of dietary change. The effect of the microbiota on transit largely depends on the amount and type (fermentable vs nonfermentable) of polysaccharides present in the diet. These results have implications for disorders that affect GI transit and gut microbial communities, including irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.047

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbial mediators of GI motility can vary by diet.

    “Interestingly, microbial mediators of GI motility can vary by diet56, 57.”
  • Recent studies suggest gut microbiota changes may underlie IBS mechanisms such as visceral hypersensitivity, altered barrier function, gastrointestinal motility, and the gut-brain axis.

    “recent studies suggest that changes in the gut microbiota may be responsible for underlying mechanisms associated with IBS such as visceral hypersensitivity, altered barrier function, gastrointestinal motility and the gut-brain axis90–93.”
  • Microbial transplantation studies in mice indicated that altered microbiota affects gastrointestinal transit through its impact on bile acid deconjugation.

    “Microbial transplantation studies in mice indicated that altered microbiota affects gastrointestinal transit, through its impact on BA deconjugation [ 47 , 48 ].”

    From Role of gut microbiota in functional constipation (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kashyap, P. C., Marcobal, A., Ursell, L. K., Larauche, M., Duboc, H., Earle, K. A., Sonnenburg, E. D., Ferreyra, J. A., Higginbottom, S. K., Million, M., Tache, Y., Pasricha, P. J., Knight, R., Farrugia, G., & Sonnenburg, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Sonnenburg, Justin L.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
144
Issue
5
Pages
967-977
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096947655
Cited by
451
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 16
FWCI
15.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01DK085025)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
diet, gastrointestinal transit, gut microbiota, humanized mice, germ-free mice, colonic motility, polysaccharides, fructooligosaccharides, polyethylene glycol, fecal microbiota transplantation, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Diet, DNA, Bacterial, Energy Metabolism, Gastrointestinal Transit, Germ-Free Life, Gastrointestinal Tract, Mice, Metagenome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review