CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 509Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchAdvanced Materials and MechanicsMotor Control and Adaptation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dimensionality and Dynamics in the Behavior of C. elegans

Open access
Stephens, Greg J., Johnson-Kerner, Bethany, Bialek, William, Ryu, William S.·2008·PLoS Computational Biology
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000028PMC PMC2276863
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A major challenge in analyzing animal behavior is to discover some underlying simplicity in complex motor actions. Here, we show that the space of shapes adopted by the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is low dimensional, with just four dimensions accounting for 95% of the shape variance. These dimensions provide a quantitative description of worm behavior, and we partially reconstruct "equations of motion" for the dynamics in this space. These dynamics have multiple attractors, and we find that the worm visits these in a rapid and almost completely deterministic response to weak thermal stimuli. Stimulus-dependent correlations among the different modes suggest that one can generate more reliable behaviors by synchronizing stimuli to the state of the worm in shape space. We confirm this prediction, effectively "steering" the worm in real time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000028

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Describing the shapes of worms. (A) Raw image in the tracking microscope. (B) The curve through the center of the body. The black circle marks the head. (C) Distances along the curve (arclength s) are measured in normalized units, and we define the tangent (s) and normal (s) to the curve at each point. The tangent points in a direction θ(s), and variations in this angle correspond to the curvature κ(s) = dθ(s)/ds. (D) All images are rotated so that 〈θ〉 = 0; therefore θ (s) provides a description of the worm's shape that is independent of our coordinate system, and intrinsic to the worm itself.
Figure 1 Describing the shapes of worms. (A) Raw image in the tracking microscope. (B) The curve through the center of the body. The black circle marks the head. (C) Distances along the curve (arclength s) are measured in normalized units, and we define the tangent (s) and normal (s) to the curve at each point. The tangent points in a direction θ(s), and variations in this angle correspond to the curvature κ(s) = dθ(s)/ds. (D) All images are rotated so that 〈θ〉 = 0; therefore θ (s) provides a description of the worm's shape that is independent of our coordinate system, and intrinsic to the worm itself.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Covariance of shape fluctuations and eigenworms. (A) The covariance matrix of fluctuations in angle C(s, s′). The inhomogeneity along the diagonal shows that the normal modes of the motion are not sinusoidal but the smooth structure of C(s, s′) means that a small number of modes are significant. (B) We find the eigenvalues of C(s, s′) and compute σ 2 K, the fraction of the total variance (integrated along the body of the worm) captured by keeping K modes (see Materials and Methods). (C) Associated with each dominant mode is an eigenvector and we refer to these as eigenworms u μ(s). The population-mean eigenworms (red) are highly reproducible across individual worms (black). (D) The fraction of variance, σ̃ 2 K, at each point along the body curve captured by keeping K modes (K = 1 to 4, from bottom to top curve). The overall error in reconstruction of the worm body curve decreases as the number of modes increases, but does so inhomogeneously. (E) In response to strong thermal stimuli, reconstructions using the eigenworms of spontaneous crawling continue to account for most of the shape variance. Worm images are recorded at times synchronized to a heat pulse and we display σ 2 K aligned with this pulse (red line). (K = 1 to 4, from bottom to top curve).
Figure 2 Covariance of shape fluctuations and eigenworms. (A) The covariance matrix of fluctuations in angle C(s, s′). The inhomogeneity along the diagonal shows that the normal modes of the motion are not sinusoidal but the smooth structure of C(s, s′) means that a small number of modes are significant. (B) We find the eigenvalues of C(s, s′) and compute σ 2 K, the fraction of the total variance (integrated along the body of the worm) captured by keeping K modes (see Materials and Methods). (C) Associated with each dominant mode is an eigenvector and we refer to these as eigenworms u μ(s). The population-mean eigenworms (red) are highly reproducible across individual worms (black). (D) The fraction of variance, σ̃ 2 K, at each point along the body curve captured by keeping K modes (K = 1 to 4, from bottom to top curve). The overall error in reconstruction of the worm body curve decreases as the number of modes increases, but does so inhomogeneously. (E) In response to strong thermal stimuli, reconstructions using the eigenworms of spontaneous crawling continue to account for most of the shape variance. Worm images are recorded at times synchronized to a heat pulse and we display σ 2 K aligned with this pulse (red line). (K = 1 to 4, from bottom to top curve).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Motions along the first two eigenworms. (A) The joint probability density of the first two amplitudes, ρ(a 1, a 2), with units such that . The ring structure suggests that these modes form an oscillator with approximately fixed amplitude and varying phase φ = tan-1(-a 2/a 1). (B) Images of worms with different values of φ show that variation in phase corresponds to propagating a wave of bending along the worm’s body. (C) Dynamics of the phase φ(t) shows long periods of linear growth, corresponding to a steady rotation in the {a 1, a 2} plane, with occasional, abrupt reversals. (D) The joint density ρ(|ν|,|ω|). The phase velocity ω = dφ/dt in shape space predicts worm’s crawling speed.
Figure 3 Motions along the first two eigenworms. (A) The joint probability density of the first two amplitudes, ρ(a 1, a 2), with units such that . The ring structure suggests that these modes form an oscillator with approximately fixed amplitude and varying phase φ = tan-1(-a 2/a 1). (B) Images of worms with different values of φ show that variation in phase corresponds to propagating a wave of bending along the worm’s body. (C) Dynamics of the phase φ(t) shows long periods of linear growth, corresponding to a steady rotation in the {a 1, a 2} plane, with occasional, abrupt reversals. (D) The joint density ρ(|ν|,|ω|). The phase velocity ω = dφ/dt in shape space predicts worm’s crawling speed.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Motions along the third eigenworm. (A) The distribution of amplitudes ρ(a 3), shown on a logarithmic scale. Units are such that , and for comparison we show the Gaussian distribution; note the longer tails in ρ(a 3). (B) Images of worms with values of a 3 in the negative tail (left), the middle (center) and positive tail (right). Large negative and positive amplitudes of a 3 correspond to bends in the dorsal and ventral direction, respectively. (C) A two minute trajectory of the center of mass sampled at 4 Hz. Periods where |a 3|>1 are colored red, illustrating the association between turning and large displacements along this mode.
Figure 4 Motions along the third eigenworm. (A) The distribution of amplitudes ρ(a 3), shown on a logarithmic scale. Units are such that , and for comparison we show the Gaussian distribution; note the longer tails in ρ(a 3). (B) Images of worms with values of a 3 in the negative tail (left), the middle (center) and positive tail (right). Large negative and positive amplitudes of a 3 correspond to bends in the dorsal and ventral direction, respectively. (C) A two minute trajectory of the center of mass sampled at 4 Hz. Periods where |a 3|>1 are colored red, illustrating the association between turning and large displacements along this mode.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Reconstructing the phase dynamics. (A) The mean acceleration of the phase F(ω,φ) in Equation 4. (B) The correlation function of the noise 〈η (t)η(t+τ)〉. The noise correlations are confined to short times relative to the phase velocity itself. (C) Trajectories in the deterministic dynamics. A selection of early-time trajectories is shown in black. At late times these same trajectories collapse to one of four attractors (red): forward and backward crawling and two pause states. (D) Joint density ρ(ω,φ) for worms sampled at 32 Hz. A sample trajectory of a single worm moving forwards, backwards, and pausing, is denoted by black arrows.
Figure 5 Reconstructing the phase dynamics. (A) The mean acceleration of the phase F(ω,φ) in Equation 4. (B) The correlation function of the noise 〈η (t)η(t+τ)〉. The noise correlations are confined to short times relative to the phase velocity itself. (C) Trajectories in the deterministic dynamics. A selection of early-time trajectories is shown in black. At late times these same trajectories collapse to one of four attractors (red): forward and backward crawling and two pause states. (D) Joint density ρ(ω,φ) for worms sampled at 32 Hz. A sample trajectory of a single worm moving forwards, backwards, and pausing, is denoted by black arrows.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Thermal responses, mode coupling and active steering. (A) The distribution of phase velocities ρt(ω) in response to a brief thermal stimulus. Within one second, the distribution becomes highly concentrated near ω = 0, corresponding to the pause states identified in Figure 5. (B) Correlations between phase in the {a 1,a 2} plane and a 3, . Shortly after the thermal impulse (t, t′>0) the modes develop a strong anti-correlation which is distinct from normal crawling. (C) Phase dependent thermal response. Worms stimulated during ventral head swings (−2≤φ≤−1) turn dorsally (red) while worms stimulated during dorsal head swings (2≤φ≤π) turn ventrally (blue). When phase is ignored there is no discernible response (grey). Solid lines denote averages while colored bands display standard deviation of the mean. (D) Worm “steering.” A thermal impulse conditioned on the instantaneous phase was delivered automatically and repeatedly, causing an orientation change in the worm's trajectory. In this example lasting 4 minutes, asynchronous impulses produced a time-averaged orientation change 〈〉 = 0.01 rad/s (black), impulses at positive phase produced a trajectory with 〈〉 = 0.10 rad/s (blue), and impulses at negative phase produced 〈〉 = –0.12 rad/s (red). This trajectory response is consistent with the mode correlations seen in Figure 6C. We found 13 out of 20 worms produced statistically different orientation changes under stimulated and non-simulated conditions while only 1 out of 20 worms responded in the same fashion when the phase was randomized (p<0.01, Fisher exact test).
Figure 6 Thermal responses, mode coupling and active steering. (A) The distribution of phase velocities ρt(ω) in response to a brief thermal stimulus. Within one second, the distribution becomes highly concentrated near ω = 0, corresponding to the pause states identified in Figure 5. (B) Correlations between phase in the {a 1,a 2} plane and a 3, . Shortly after the thermal impulse (t, t′>0) the modes develop a strong anti-correlation which is distinct from normal crawling. (C) Phase dependent thermal response. Worms stimulated during ventral head swings (−2≤φ≤−1) turn dorsally (red) while worms stimulated during dorsal head swings (2≤φ≤π) turn ventrally (blue). When phase is ignored there is no discernible response (grey). Solid lines denote averages while colored bands display standard deviation of the mean. (D) Worm “steering.” A thermal impulse conditioned on the instantaneous phase was delivered automatically and repeatedly, causing an orientation change in the worm's trajectory. In this example lasting 4 minutes, asynchronous impulses produced a time-averaged orientation change 〈〉 = 0.01 rad/s (black), impulses at positive phase produced a trajectory with 〈〉 = 0.10 rad/s (blue), and impulses at negative phase produced 〈〉 = –0.12 rad/s (red). This trajectory response is consistent with the mode correlations seen in Figure 6C. We found 13 out of 20 worms produced statistically different orientation changes under stimulated and non-simulated conditions while only 1 out of 20 worms responded in the same fashion when the phase was randomized (p<0.01, Fisher exact test).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J Frenet, 1985, Sur quelque properietès des courbes á double courbure. Thèse, Toulouse, 1847., Abstract in Jour de Math, 17, 437

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stephens, G. J., Johnson-Kerner, B., Bialek, W., & Ryu, W. S.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Stephens, Greg J.
  • Ryu, William S.
ORCID
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2008-04-25
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e1000028
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
DOI
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000028
PMC
PMC2276863
OpenAlex
W2142254043
Cited by
509
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 24
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
Caenorhabditis elegans, worm locomotion, body shape, equations of motion, attractors, thermal stimuli, behavioral synchronization
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Computer Simulation, Gait, Locomotion, Models, Biological, Caenorhabditis elegans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review