Cited by 385Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceControl Systems and IdentificationGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

VBA: A Probabilistic Treatment of Nonlinear Models for Neurobiological and Behavioural Data

Open access
Daunizeau, Jean, Adam, Vincent, Rigoux, Lionel·2014·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

This work is in line with an on-going effort tending toward a computational (quantitative and refutable) understanding of human neuro-cognitive processes. Many sophisticated models for behavioural and neurobiological data have flourished during the past decade. Most of these models are partly unspecified (i.e. they have unknown parameters) and nonlinear. This makes them difficult to peer with a formal statistical data analysis framework. In turn, this compromises the reproducibility of model-based empirical studies. This work exposes a software toolbox that provides generic, efficient and robust probabilistic solutions to the three problems of model-based analysis of empirical data: (i) data simulation, (ii) parameter estimation/model selection, and (iii) experimental design optimization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003441

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The HGF workflow included extraction of empirical priors from pilot and Lawson data, parameter recovery, model identifiability, posterior predictive checks, and random-effect Bayesian model comparison.

    “The workflow includes the extraction of empirical priors from a combination of our pilot data and the data shared from Lawson et al. [17], parameter recovery and model identifiability based on simulated data, posterior predictive checks and random-effect analysis Bayesian model comparison as implemented in the VBA toolbox [41].”
  • Model fitting was performed using a variational Bayesian estimation procedure using the well-validated VBA toolbox.

    “Model fitting was performed using a variational Bayesian estimation procedure using the well-validated VBA toolbox 58 .”

    From Stress-sensitive inference of task controllability (2022) · cites this paper as [58]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Robert C. (2007), The Bayesian choice: From Decision-Theoretic Foundations to Computational Implementation. Springer, August 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daunizeau, J., Adam, V., & Rigoux, L.
Affiliations
  • Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit (GB)
  • Institut du Cerveau (FR)
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2014-01-23
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
e1003441
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2049657715
Cited by
385
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9
FWCI
21.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
stochastic modeling, nonlinear models, parameter estimation, model selection, data simulation, experimental design optimization, behavioral data, computational neuroscience, reproducibility
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Cognition, Computer Simulation, Decision Making, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Probability, Software, Stochastic Processes, Normal Distribution, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review