Cited by 117Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsNutritional Studies and Diet

Television Viewing and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Prospective Associations and Mediation Analysis in the EPIC Norfolk Study

Open access
Wijndaele, Katrien, Brage, Søren, Besson, Hervé, Khaw, Kay-Tee, Sharp, Stephen J., Luben, Robert, Bhaniani, Amit, Wareham, Nicholas J. +1 more·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although television viewing time is detrimentally associated with intermediate cardiovascular risk factors, the relationship with incident total (i.e. combined fatal and non-fatal) cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-fatal CVD and coronary heart disease is largely unknown. This study examined whether television viewing time is associated with these three outcomes, independently of physical activity energy expenditure and other confounding variables. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A population-based cohort of 12,608 men and women (aged 61.4±9.0), free from stroke, myocardial infarction and cancer at baseline in 1998-2000 were followed up until 2007 (6.9±1.9 years). Participants self-reported education, smoking, alcohol use, antihypertensive, lipid lowering and antidepressant medication, disease history, total energy intake, sleep duration, physical activity and television viewing. BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol and glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were measured by standardized procedures; a clustered metabolic risk score was constructed. Every one hour/day increase in television viewing was associated with an increased hazard for total (HR = 1.06, 95%CI = 1.03-1.08; 2,620 cases), non-fatal CVD (HR = 1.06, 95%CI = 1.03-1.09; 2,134 cases), and coronary heart disease (HR = 1.08, 95%CI = 1.03-1.13; 940 cases), independent of gender, age, education, smoking, alcohol, medication, diabetes status, CVD family history, sleep duration and physical activity energy expenditure. Energy intake, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, HbA(1c) and the clustered metabolic risk score only partially mediated these associations. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the most prevalent leisure time (sedentary) behaviour, television viewing, independently contributes to increased CVD risk. Recommendations on reducing television viewing time should be considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0020058

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The average difference between genders in TV viewing report was 1.8 ± 1.4%.

    “Report of TV viewing by gender was less common, the average difference between gender report was 1.8 ± 1.4% [16,17,21,23].”
  • Wijndaele et al. reported the largest gender difference, with 3.7% more females reporting >3.6 h TV viewing daily.

    “The largest gender difference reported by Wijndaele, et al. [16] where 3.7% more females reported levels of >3.6 h TV viewing daily.”
  • The EPIC survey found that 32.5% of older adults reported TV viewing over 3.6 h per day.

    “The EPIC survey reported by tertiles and found that 32.5% reported TV viewing over 3.6 h per day [16].”
  • TV viewing is correlated with negative health outcomes, such as cardiovascular disease, mortality and being overweight or obese.

    “TV viewing has also been well correlated with negative health outcomes, such as cardiovascular disease, mortality and being overweight or obese [16,19,22,30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wijndaele, K., Brage, S., Besson, H., Khaw, K.-T., Sharp, S. J., Luben, R., Bhaniani, A., Wareham, N. J., & Ekelund, U.
Affiliations
  • Research Foundation - Flanders (BE)
  • MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Ekelund, Ulf
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-05-25
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
e20058
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037124155
Cited by
117
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation
  • European Commission
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
television viewing, sedentary behavior, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, incident cardiovascular disease, mediation analysis, metabolic risk score, physical activity, EPIC-Norfolk cohort
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Energy Metabolism, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Television, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review