Cited by 100Sport Psychology and PerformancePsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Subjecting elite athletes to inspiratory breathing load reveals behavioral and neural signatures of optimal performers in extreme environments

Open access
Paulus, Martin P., Flagan, Taru, Simmons, Alan N., Gillis, Kristine, Kotturi, Sante, Thom, Nathaniel, Johnson, Douglas C., Van Orden, Karl F. +2 more·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether and how elite athletes process physiological or psychological challenges differently than healthy comparison subjects. In general, individuals optimize exercise level as it relates to differences between expected and experienced exertion, which can be conceptualized as a body prediction error. The process of computing a body prediction error involves the insular cortex, which is important for interoception, i.e. the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Thus, optimal performance may be related to efficient minimization of the body prediction error. We examined the hypothesis that elite athletes, compared to control subjects, show attenuated insular cortex activation during an aversive interoceptive challenge. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Elite adventure racers (n = 10) and healthy volunteers (n = 11) performed a continuous performance task with varying degrees of a non-hypercapnic breathing load while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. The results indicate that (1) non-hypercapnic inspiratory breathing load is an aversive experience associated with a profound activation of a distributed set of brain areas including bilateral insula, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulated; (2) adventure racers relative to comparison subjects show greater accuracy on the continuous performance task during the aversive interoceptive condition; and (3) adventure racers show an attenuated right insula cortex response during and following the aversive interoceptive condition of non-hypercapnic inspiratory breathing load. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support the hypothesis that elite athletes during an aversive interoceptive condition show better performance and an attenuated insular cortex activation during the aversive experience. Interestingly, differential modulation of the right insular cortex has been found previously in elite military personnel and appears to be emerging as an important brain system for optimal performance in extreme environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0029394

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the exception of manipulations of inspiratory breathing load, we presently lack non-invasive methods to induce interoceptive prediction errors.

    “With the exception of manipulations of inspiratory breathing load (Paulus et al., 2012), we presently lack non-invasive methods to do so, and new paradigms will need to be developed.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paulus, M. P., Flagan, T., Simmons, A. N., Gillis, K., Kotturi, S., Thom, N., Johnson, D. C., Van Orden, K. F., Davenport, P. W., & Swain, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
Paulus, Martin P.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-01-19
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e29394
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027543384
Cited by
100
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
19.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000064)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
elite athletes, insula, interoception, adventure racing, optimal performance, extreme environments, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, continuous performance test
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways, Psychomotor Performance, Respiratory Mechanics, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review