Cited by 30Respiratory and Cough-Related ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Brain mechanisms of short-term habituation and sensitization toward dyspnea

Open access
Stoeckel, M. Cornelia, Esser, Roland W., Gamer, Matthias, Büchel, Christian, von Leupoldt, Andreas·2015·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Dyspnea is a prevalent and threatening cardinal symptom in many diseases including asthma. Whether patients suffering from dyspnea show habituation or sensitization toward repeated experiences of dyspnea is relevant for both quality of life and treatment success. Understanding the mechanisms, including the underlying brain activation patterns, that determine the dynamics of dyspnea perception seems crucial for the improvement of treatment and rehabilitation. Toward this aim, we investigated the interplay between short-term changes of dyspnea perception and changes of related brain activation. Healthy individuals underwent repeated blocks of resistive load induced dyspnea with parallel acquisition of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Late vs. early ratings on dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness were correlated with late vs. early brain activation for both, dyspnea anticipation and dyspnea perception. Individual trait and state anxiety were determined using questionnaire data. Our results indicate an involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), midbrain/periaqueductal gray (PAG) and anterior insular cortex in habituation/sensitization toward dyspnea. Changes in the anterior insular cortex were particularly linked to changes in dyspnea unpleasantness. Changes of both dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness were positively correlated with state and trait anxiety. Our findings are in line with the suggested relationship between the anterior insular cortex and dyspnea unpleasantness. They further support the notion that habituation/sensitization toward dyspnea is influenced by anxiety. Our study extends the known role of the midbrain/PAG in anti-nociception to an additional involvement in habituation/sensitization toward dyspnea and suggests an interplay with the OFC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00748

Cites

42 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Respiratory symptoms can be triggered by conditional learning, and individuals with elevated anxiety levels may have a particular tendency for this type of associative learning.

    “Other experimental studies have shown that respiratory symptoms can be triggered due to conditional learning, and that individuals with elevated anxiety levels may have a particular tendency for this type of associative learning (Stoeckel et al., 2015, Stoeckel et al., 2016).”

    From Targeting excessive avoidance behavior to reduce anxiety related to asthma: A feasibility study of an exposure-based treatment delivered online (2021) · cites this paper as Stoeckel et al., 2015

    The Introduction (page not supplied) says learning can modulate the perception of dyspnea, and the Results > Personality Traits section reports that higher anxiety was associated with greater sensitization to repeated dyspnea. Neither passage establishes that conditioning triggers respiratory symptoms or that anxious individuals are more prone to associative learning; the study examined habituation and sensitization, not conditioning. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stoeckel, M. C., Esser, R. W., Gamer, M., Büchel, C., & von Leupoldt, A.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2015-06-02
Volume
6
Pages
748-748
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1621130312
Cited by
30
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG LE 1843/9‐2, LE 1843/9‐2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
dyspnea, habituation, sensitization, dyspnea perception, anterior insula, orbitofrontal cortex, periaqueductal gray, midbrain, anxiety, resistive load, asthma, brain activation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review