Cited by 42Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Under pressure: adolescent substance users show exaggerated neural processing of aversive interoceptive stimuli

Open access
Berk, Lotte, Stewart, Jennifer L., May, April C., Wiers, Reinout W., Davenport, Paul W., Paulus, Martin P., Tapert, Susan F.·2015·Addiction

Abstract

Aims: Adolescents with substance use disorders (SUD) exhibit hyposensitivity to pleasant internally generated (interoceptive) stimuli and hypersensitivity to external rewarding stimuli. It is unclear whether similar patterns exist for aversive interoceptive stimuli. We compared activation in the insular cortex and other brain regions during the anticipation and experience of aversive stimuli between adolescents with SUD and those without. Design: Cross‐sectional experimental study with two groups. Participants: Adolescents (ages 15–17 years) with an alcohol or marijuana SUD (n = 18) and healthy comparison subjects (CON, n = 15). Participants were recruited by distributing flyers at local high schools. Setting: Keck Imaging Center, University of California San Diego, CA, USA. Measurements: Behavioral and neural responses to a continuous performance task with inspiratory breathing load recorded during an fMRI session. Questionnaires assessed life‐time drug use, anxiety, sensation‐seeking, impulsivity, affect and bodily awareness. Visual analog scales assessed drug craving and breathing load responses. Findings: Across subjects, experience of breathing load elicited greater bilateral anterior and posterior insula (AI and PI, respectively) activation than anticipation (F(1,31) = 4.16, P < 0.05). SUD exhibited greater left AI and bilateral PI activation during breathing load than anticipation, compared with CON (F(1,31) = 4.16, P < 0.05). In contrast, CON showed greater activation during anticipation than breathing load in left PI, compared with SUD (F(1,31) = 4.16, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Adolescents with alcohol and marijuana substance use disorders may be hypersensitive to aversive interoceptive stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.13090

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atypical insula activation to interoceptive signals has been reported in adolescents with obesity and those with substance use disorders.

    “Atypical insula activation to interoceptive signals, for example, has been reported in adolescents with obesity (Delgado-Rico et al., 2013; Mata et al., 2015) and those with substance use disorders (Berk et al., 2015; Migliorini et al., 2013).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Berk et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Johnston L. D., O'Malley P. M., Bachman J. G., Schulenberg J. E., Miech R. A. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2013. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2014; pp. 1-659.
  2. Lancaster J. L., Woldorff M. G., Parsons L. M., Liotti M., Freitas C. S., Rainey L. et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 10: 120-31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berk, L., Stewart, J. L., May, A. C., Wiers, R. W., Davenport, P. W., Paulus, M. P., & Tapert, S. F.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Queens College, CUNY (US)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Tapert, Susan F.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-28
Volume
110
Issue
12
Pages
2025-2036
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2158944539
Cited by
42
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (5P20DA027843)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
adolescent substance use disorders, interoceptive sensitivity, insula, anterior insula, posterior insula, alcoholism, cannabis use disorder, drug craving, sensation seeking, impulsivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Analysis of Variance, Carbon Dioxide, Cerebral Cortex, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Respiration, Anticipation, Psychological, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review