Cited by 361Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesMolecular Sensors and Ion Detection

A genetically encoded FRET lactate sensor and its use to detect the Warburg effect in single cancer cells

Open access
San Martín, Alejandro, Ceballo, Sebastián, Ruminot, Iván, Lerchundi, Rodrigo, Frommer, Wolf B., Barros, Luis Felipe·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Lactate is shuttled between and inside cells, playing metabolic and signaling roles in healthy tissues. Lactate is also a harbinger of altered metabolism and participates in the pathogenesis of inflammation, hypoxia/ischemia, neurodegeneration and cancer. Many tumor cells show high rates of lactate production in the presence of oxygen, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect, which has diagnostic and possibly therapeutic implications. In this article we introduce Laconic, a genetically-encoded Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based lactate sensor designed on the bacterial transcription factor LldR. Laconic quantified lactate from 1 µM to 10 mM and was not affected by glucose, pyruvate, acetate, betahydroxybutyrate, glutamate, citrate, α-ketoglutarate, succinate, malate or oxalacetate at concentrations found in mammalian cytosol. Expressed in astrocytes, HEK cells and T98G glioma cells, the sensor allowed dynamic estimation of lactate levels in single cells. Used in combination with a blocker of the monocarboxylate transporter MCT, the sensor was capable of discriminating whether a cell is a net lactate producer or a net lactate consumer. Application of the MCT-block protocol showed that the basal rate of lactate production is 3-5 fold higher in T98G glioma cells than in normal astrocytes. In contrast, the rate of lactate accumulation in response to mitochondrial inhibition with sodium azide was 10 times lower in glioma than in astrocytes, consistent with defective tumor metabolism. A ratio between the rate of lactate production and the rate of azide-induced lactate accumulation, which can be estimated reversibly and in single cells, was identified as a highly sensitive parameter of the Warburg effect, with values of 4.1 ± 0.5 for T98G glioma cells and 0.07 ± 0.007 for astrocytes. In summary, this article describes a genetically-encoded sensor for lactate and its use to measure lactate concentration, lactate flux, and the Warburg effect in single mammalian cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0057712

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. [1]Gladden LB (2004) Lactate metabolism: a new paradigm for the third millennium. J Physiol 558: 5– 30. 15131240 PMC1664920
  2. [2]Brooks GA (2009) Cell-cell and intracellular lactate shuttles. J Physiol 587: 5591– 5600. jphysiol.2009.178350 [pii]; 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.178350 [doi]. PMC2805372 19805739 · DOI
  3. [3]Pellerin L, Bouzier-Sore AK, Aubert A, Serres S, Merle M, et al (2007) Activity-dependent regulation of energy metabolism by astrocytes: an update. Glia 55: 1251– 1262. 17659524
  4. [4]Barros LF, Deitmer JW (2010) Glucose and lactate supply to the synapse. Brain Res Rev 63: 149– 159. 19879896
  5. [6]Wyss MT, Jolivet R, Buck A, Magistretti PJ, Weber B (2011) In vivo evidence for lactate as a neuronal energy source. J Neurosci 31: 7477– 7485 31/20/7477 [pii]; 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0415-11.2011 [doi]. 21593331 PMC6622597 · DOI
  6. [7]Jolivet R, Allaman I, Pellerin L, Magistretti PJ, Weber B (2010) Comment on recent modeling studies of astrocyte-neuron metabolic interactions. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30: 1982– 1986 jcbfm2010132 [pii]; 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.132 [doi]. 20700131 PMC3002878 · DOI
  7. [8]Rinholm JE, Hamilton NB, Kessaris N, Richardson WD, Bergersen LH, et al (2011) Regulation of oligodendrocyte development and myelination by glucose and lactate. J Neurosci 31: 538– 548 31/2/538 [pii]; 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3516-10.2011 [doi]. 21228163 PMC3044866 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [10]Shimizu H, Watanabe E, Hiyama TY, Nagakura A, Fujikawa A, et al (2007) Glial Nax channels control lactate signaling to neurons for brain [Na+] sensing. Neuron 54: 59– 72. 17408578
  9. [11]Sotelo-Hitschfeld T, Fernandez-Moncada I, Barros LF (2012) Acute feedback control of astrocytic glycolysis by lactate. Glia 60: 674– 680 10.1002/glia.22304 [doi]. 22290492 · DOI
  10. [13]Newman LA, Korol DL, Gold PE (2011) Lactate produced by glycogenolysis in astrocytes regulates memory processing. PLoS One 6: e28427 10.1371/journal.pone.0028427 [doi];PONE-D-11-12947 [pii]. 22180782 PMC3236748 · DOI
  11. [14]Ganapathy V, Thangaraju M, Prasad PD (2009) Nutrient transporters in cancer: relevance to Warburg hypothesis and beyond. Pharmacol Ther 121: 29– 40. 18992769
  12. [16]Tennant DA, Duran RV, Gottlieb E (2010) Targeting metabolic transformation for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 10: 267– 277 nrc2817 [pii]; 10.1038/nrc2817 [doi]. 20300106 · DOI
  13. [19]Gao YG, Suzuki H, Itou H, Zhou Y, Tanaka Y, et al (2008) Structural and functional characterization of the LldR from Corynebacterium glutamicum: a transcriptional repressor involved in L-lactate and sugar utilization. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 7110– 7123 gkn827 [pii]; 10.1093/nar/gkn827 [doi]. 18988622 PMC2602784 · DOI
  14. [20]Aguilera L, Campos E, Gimenez R, Badia J, Aguilar J, et al (2008) Dual role of LldR in regulation of the lldPRD operon, involved in L-lactate metabolism in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 190: 2997– 3005 JB.02013-07 [pii]; 10.1128/JB.02013-07 [doi]. 18263722 PMC2293229 · DOI
  15. [21]Deuschle K, Okumoto S, Fehr M, Looger LL, Kozhukh L, et al (2005) Construction and optimization of a family of genetically encoded metabolite sensors by semirational protein engineering. Protein Sci 14: 2304– 2314. 16131659 PMC2253473
  16. [22]Day RN, Booker CF, Periasamy A (2008) Characterization of an improved donor fluorescent protein for Forster resonance energy transfer microscopy. J Biomed Opt 13: 031203 10.1117/1.2939094 [doi]. 18601527 PMC2483694 · DOI
  17. [23]Nagai T, Ibata K, Park ES, Kubota M, Mikoshiba K, et al (2002) A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological applications. Nat Biotechnol 20: 87– 90 10.1038/nbt0102-87 [doi];nbt0102-87 [pii]. 11753368 · DOI
  18. [24]Takanaga H, Frommer WB (2010) Facilitative plasma membrane transporters function during ER transit. FASEB J 24: 2849– 2858 fj.09-146472 [pii]; 10.1096/fj.09-146472 [doi]. 20354141 PMC3230527 · DOI
  19. [25]Siess EA, Brocks DG, Wieland OH (1978) Distribution of metabolites between the cytosolic and mitochondrial compartments of hepatocytes isolated from fed rats. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem 359: 785– 798. 680639
  20. [26]Kauppinen RA, Hiltunen JK, Hassinen IE (1982) Compartmentation of citrate in relation to the regulation of glycolysis and the mitochondrial transmembrane proton electrochemical potential gradient in isolated perfused rat heart. Biochim Biophys Acta 681: 286– 291 0005-2728(82)90033-0 [pii]. 7115698
  21. [27]Saha AK, Laybutt DR, Dean D, Vavvas D, Sebokova E, et al (1999) Cytosolic citrate and malonyl-CoA regulation in rat muscle in vivo. Am J Physiol 276: E1030– E1037. 10362615
  22. [29]Gao C, Hu C, Zheng Z, Ma C, Jiang T, et al (2012) Lactate utilization is regulated by the FadR-type regulator LldR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 194: 2687– 2692 JB.06579-11 [pii]; 10.1128/JB.06579-11 [doi]. 22408166 PMC3347178 · DOI
  23. [30]Brown MA, Brooks GA (1994) Trans-stimulation of lactate transport from rat sarcolemmal membrane vesicles. Arch Biochem Biophys 313: 22– 28 S0003-9861(84)71353-1 [pii]; 10.1006/abbi.1994.1353 [doi]. 8053682 · DOI
  24. [31]Zhao Y, Jin J, Hu Q, Zhou HM, Yi J, et al (2011) Genetically encoded fluorescent sensors for intracellular NADH detection. Cell Metab 14: 555– 566 S1550-4131(11)00350-0 [pii]; 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.09.004 [doi]. 21982715 PMC3253140 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [32]Maughan DW, Henkin JA, Vigoreaux JO (2005) Concentrations of glycolytic enzymes and other cytosolic proteins in the diffusible fraction of a vertebrate muscle proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 1541– 1549 M500053-MCP200 [pii]; 10.1074/mcp.M500053-MCP200 [doi]. 15982968 · DOI
  26. [33]Miyawaki A, Griesbeck O, Heim R, Tsien RY (1999) Dynamic and quantitative Ca2+ measurements using improved cameleons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 2135– 2140. 10051607 PMC26749
  27. [34]Bittner CX, Loaiza A, Ruminot I, Larenas V, Sotelo-Hitschfeld T, et al (2010) High resolution measurement of the glycolytic rate. Front Neuroenergetics 2: 1– 11 doi: 10.3389/fnene.2010.00026. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2010.00026. 20890447 PMC2947927 · DOI
  28. [35]Bittner CX, Valdebenito R, Ruminot I, Loaiza A, Larenas V, et al (2011) Fast and reversible stimulation of astrocytic glycolysis by K+ and a delayed and persistent effect of glutamate. J Neurosci 31: 4709– 4713. 21430169 PMC6622916
  29. [36]Ruminot I, Gutiérrez R, Peña-Munzenmeyer G, Añazco C, Sotelo-Hitschfeld T, et al (2011) NBCe1 mediates the acute stimulation of astrocytic glycolysis by extracellular K+. J Neurosci 31: 14264– 14271. 21976511 PMC3200293
  30. [37]Takanaga H, Chaudhuri B, Frommer WB (2008) GLUT1 and GLUT9 as major contributors to glucose influx in HepG2 cells identified by a high sensitivity intramolecular FRET glucose sensor. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778: 1091– 1099. 18177733 PMC2315637
  31. [38]Ovens MJ, Davies AJ, Wilson MC, Murray CM, Halestrap AP (2010) AR-C155858 is a potent inhibitor of monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT2 that binds to an intracellular site involving transmembrane helices 7–10. Biochem J 425: 523– 530 BJ20091515 [pii]; 10.1042/BJ20091515 [doi]. 19929853 PMC2811425 · DOI
  32. [39]Georgi T, Engels V, Wendisch VF (2008) Regulation of L-lactate utilization by the FadR-type regulator LldR of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol 190: 963– 971 JB.01147-07 [pii]; 10.1128/JB.01147-07 [doi]. 18039772 PMC2223578 · DOI
  33. [40]Fehr M, Lalonde S, Lager I, Wolff MW, Frommer WB (2003) In vivo imaging of the dynamics of glucose uptake in the cytosol of COS-7 cells by fluorescent nanosensors. J Biol Chem 278: 19127– 19133. 12649277
  34. [41]Fehr M, Frommer WB, Lalonde S (2002) Visualization of maltose uptake in living yeast cells by fluorescent nanosensors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 9846– 9851 10.1073/pnas.142089199 [doi];142089199 [pii]. 12097642 PMC125039 · DOI
  35. [42]Okumoto S, Looger LL, Micheva KD, Reimer RJ, Smith SJ, et al (2005) Detection of glutamate release from neurons by genetically encoded surface-displayed FRET nanosensors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 8740– 8745 0503274102 [pii]; 10.1073/pnas.0503274102 [doi]. 15939876 PMC1143584 · DOI
  36. [43]Lager I, Looger LL, Hilpert M, Lalonde S, Frommer WB (2006) Conversion of a putative Agrobacterium sugar-binding protein into a FRET sensor with high selectivity for sucrose. J Biol Chem 281: 30875– 30883 M605257200 [pii]; 10.1074/jbc.M605257200 [doi]. 16912038 · DOI
  37. [44]Rouach N, Koulakoff A, Abudara V, Willecke K, Giaume C (2008) Astroglial metabolic networks sustain hippocampal synaptic transmission. Science 322: 1551– 1555. 19056987
  38. [45]Hussien R, Brooks GA (2011) Mitochondrial and plasma membrane lactate transporter and lactate dehydrogenase isoform expression in breast cancer cell lines. Physiol Genomics 43: 255– 264 physiolgenomics.00177.2010 [pii]; 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00177.2010 [doi]. 21177384 PMC3068517 · DOI
  39. [47]Dubouchaud H, Butterfield GE, Wolfel EE, Bergman BC, Brooks GA (2000) Endurance training, expression, and physiology of LDH, MCT1, and MCT4 in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278: E571– E579. 10751188
  40. [48]Marcillac F, Brix B, Repond C, Johren O, Pellerin L (2011) Nitric oxide induces the expression of the monocarboxylate transporter MCT4 in cultured astrocytes by a cGMP-independent transcriptional activation. Glia 59: 1987– 1995 10.1002/glia.21240 [doi]. 21901758 · DOI
  41. [49]Dimmer KS, Friedrich B, Lang F, Deitmer JW, Broer S (2000) The low-affinity monocarboxylate transporter MCT4 is adapted to the export of lactate in highly glycolytic cells. Biochem J 350 Pt 1: 219–27.: 219– 227. 10926847 PMC1221245
  42. [50]Tennant DA, Duran RV, Boulahbel H, Gottlieb E (2009) Metabolic transformation in cancer. Carcinogenesis 30: 1269– 1280 bgp070 [pii]; 10.1093/carcin/bgp070 [doi]. 19321800 · DOI
  43. [52]Schmidt MM, Dringen R (2009) Differential effects of iodoacetamide and iodoacetate on glycolysis and glutathione metabolism of cultured astrocytes. Front Neuroenergetics 1: 1 10.3389/neuro.14.001.2009 [doi]. 19584905 PMC2691547 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
San Martín, A., Ceballo, S., Ruminot, I., Lerchundi, R., Frommer, W. B., & Barros, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Austral University of Chile (CL)
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • Centro de Estudios Científicos (CL)
Corresponding author
Barros, Luis Felipe
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-02-26
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
e57712
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055755990
Cited by
361
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK079109, 1RO1DK079109)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection
Keywords
lactate sensor, Warburg effect, monocarboxylate transporters, lactate flux, glioma cells, astrocytes, cancer metabolism, mitochondrial inhibition, sodium azide, lactic acid production
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, DNA-Binding Proteins, Glioma, Humans, Male, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Transcription Factors, Biosensing Techniques, Lactic Acid, Escherichia coli Proteins, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Mice, HEK293 Cells, Single-Cell Analysis, Spatio-Temporal Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review