Cited by 41Visual perception and processing mechanismsSchizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditions

Abnormal contextual modulation of visual contour detection in patients with schizophrenia

Open access
Schallmo, Michael-Paul, Sponheim, Scott R., Olman, Cheryl A.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Schizophrenia patients demonstrate perceptual deficits consistent with broad dysfunction in visual context processing. These include poor integration of segments forming visual contours, and reduced visual contrast effects (e.g. weaker orientation-dependent surround suppression, ODSS). Background image context can influence contour perception, as stimuli near the contour affect detection accuracy. Because of ODSS, this contextual modulation depends on the relative orientation between the contour and flanking elements, with parallel flankers impairing contour perception. However in schizophrenia, the impact of abnormal ODSS during contour perception is not clear. It is also unknown whether deficient contour perception marks genetic liability for schizophrenia, or is strictly associated with clinical expression of this disorder. We examined contour detection in 25 adults with schizophrenia, 13 unaffected first-degree biological relatives of schizophrenia patients, and 28 healthy controls. Subjects performed a psychophysics experiment designed to quantify the effect of flanker orientation during contour detection. Overall, patients with schizophrenia showed poorer contour detection performance than relatives or controls. Parallel flankers suppressed and orthogonal flankers enhanced contour detection performance for all groups, but parallel suppression was relatively weaker for schizophrenia patients than healthy controls. Relatives of patients showed equivalent performance with controls. Computational modeling suggested that abnormal contextual modulation in schizophrenia may be explained by suppression that is more broadly tuned for orientation. Abnormal flanker suppression in schizophrenia is consistent with weaker ODSS and/or broader orientation tuning. This work provides the first evidence that such perceptual abnormalities may not be associated with a genetic liability for schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0068090

Cites

62 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In schizophrenia, contour integration ability correlates with surround suppression sensitivity.

    “Recently, Schallmo et al. (2013) highlighted the abnormal integrative dimension of perceptual organization in schizophrenia, showing that patients' abilities for contour integration correlated with their surround suppression sensitivity, while these two illusory phenomena had previously only been shown to be impaired in isolation.”

    From What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia (2014) · cites this paper as Schallmo et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schallmo, M.-P., Sponheim, S. R., & Olman, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Schallmo, Michael-Paul
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-06-18
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
e68090
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020307436
Cited by
41
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (00006595)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 CX000227)
  • National Institutes of Health (I01CX000227)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32 GM08471, T32GM008471)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS075525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
schizophrenia, contextual modulation, genetic susceptibility, first-degree relatives, orientation tuning, perceptual deficits
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Schizophrenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review