Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Myeloid-Specific Rictor Deletion Induces M1 Macrophage Polarization and Potentiates In Vivo Pro-Inflammatory Response to Lipopolysaccharide

Festuccia, William T., Pouliot, Philippe, Bakan, Inan, Sabatini, David M., Laplante, Mathieu·2014·PLoS ONE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0095432

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 TLR4 activation with LPS induces the phosphorylation of AKT. (A) Response of Raw264.7 macrophages to LPS. Raw264.7 macrophages were plated and incubated overnight. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and incubated for 16 hours in DMEM 0.1% FBS. Then, cells were treated with LPS (500ng/ml) for the indicated time. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. (B) Impact of LPS on cell signalling in Rictor +/+ and Rictor −/− MEFs. MEFs were plated 24 hours before the experimentation. The next day, cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated in DMEM 0.1% FBS for 2 hours. Cells were then treated with LPS (5ug/ml) for the indicate time. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins.
Figure 1 TLR4 activation with LPS induces the phosphorylation of AKT. (A) Response of Raw264.7 macrophages to LPS. Raw264.7 macrophages were plated and incubated overnight. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and incubated for 16 hours in DMEM 0.1% FBS. Then, cells were treated with LPS (500ng/ml) for the indicated time. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. (B) Impact of LPS on cell signalling in Rictor +/+ and Rictor −/− MEFs. MEFs were plated 24 hours before the experimentation. The next day, cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated in DMEM 0.1% FBS for 2 hours. Cells were then treated with LPS (5ug/ml) for the indicate time. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Production of a macrophage-specific Rictor knock-out mouse model. (A) PCR strategy for the genotyping and identification of wild-type and KO mice. On the left panel is presented the PCR reaction showing the presence or the absence of the Lox allele in the Rictor gene. PCR was performed from a piece of tail collected from mice. The right part of the panel shows the efficiency of the recombination of the Rictor allele in BMDM isolated from the Rictor wt/wt, Rictor Lox/wt, Rictor Lox/Lox expressing or not the LysMcre. The presence of the Δ allele confirms the recombination of the Lox sites and the deletion of the targeted exon. (B to D) Confirmation of the specific loss of RICTOR in (B) BMDM and (C) TEM but not in (D) other mouse tissues. BMDM and TEM were isolated from mice and cultured as described in the methods sections. Proteins were extracted from cells and tissues and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. In B, C, and D, each line represents one mouse. (E–F) The loss of Rictor does not affect cell morphology and proliferation of (E) BMDM or (F) TEM.
Figure 2 Production of a macrophage-specific Rictor knock-out mouse model. (A) PCR strategy for the genotyping and identification of wild-type and KO mice. On the left panel is presented the PCR reaction showing the presence or the absence of the Lox allele in the Rictor gene. PCR was performed from a piece of tail collected from mice. The right part of the panel shows the efficiency of the recombination of the Rictor allele in BMDM isolated from the Rictor wt/wt, Rictor Lox/wt, Rictor Lox/Lox expressing or not the LysMcre. The presence of the Δ allele confirms the recombination of the Lox sites and the deletion of the targeted exon. (B to D) Confirmation of the specific loss of RICTOR in (B) BMDM and (C) TEM but not in (D) other mouse tissues. BMDM and TEM were isolated from mice and cultured as described in the methods sections. Proteins were extracted from cells and tissues and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. In B, C, and D, each line represents one mouse. (E–F) The loss of Rictor does not affect cell morphology and proliferation of (E) BMDM or (F) TEM.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 TLR activation promotes AKT phosphorylation through the activation of mTORC2. BMDM were isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice and were differentiated for 6 days in vitro. Cells were then plated and incubated 24 hours. Cells were wash twice with PBS, incubated 2 hours in RPMI 0.1% FBS and then treated with (A) LPS (250ng/ml), (B) R848 (0.1uM), or (C) CpG (0.5uM) for the indicated times. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins.
Figure 3 TLR activation promotes AKT phosphorylation through the activation of mTORC2. BMDM were isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice and were differentiated for 6 days in vitro. Cells were then plated and incubated 24 hours. Cells were wash twice with PBS, incubated 2 hours in RPMI 0.1% FBS and then treated with (A) LPS (250ng/ml), (B) R848 (0.1uM), or (C) CpG (0.5uM) for the indicated times. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 mTORC2 loss exacerbates the pro-inflammatory profile of BMDM in response to LPS. (A) Basal gene expression in macrophages isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. BMDM were isolated and differentiated for 6 days as described in the methods sections. For each genotype, BMDM isolated from 3 mice were pooled together to get enough biological material for all the studies. Cells were then allowed to rest for 48 hours. mRNA expression of markers of the classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages were measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to 36B4 mRNA levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 3 per condition. *p<0.05 versus control. (B) Impact of LPS on gene expression in macrophages isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. Cells isolated and differentiated as in A were treated with LPS (250ng/ml) for 10 hours. RNA expression was measured as described in A. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 3 per condition. *p<0.05 versus control. This experiment was performed 3 times with similar outcome. (C to E) Secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines by BMDM isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice in response to LPS. Cell culture media in which BMDM were incubated was collected and (C) TNF-α, (D) IL-12P40 and (E) IL-6 secretion levels were measured by ELISA. This measurement was repeated in another independent experiment and similar results were observed. (F) Impact of LPS on gene expression in Rictor +/+ and Rictor −/− MEFs. MEFs were plated 24 hours before the experimentation. The next day, cells were then treated with LPS (5ug/ml) for 10 hours. mRNA expression of several genes was measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to 36B4 mRNA levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 4 per condition. *p<0.05 versus control. This experiment was repeated once with similar outcome.
Figure 4 mTORC2 loss exacerbates the pro-inflammatory profile of BMDM in response to LPS. (A) Basal gene expression in macrophages isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. BMDM were isolated and differentiated for 6 days as described in the methods sections. For each genotype, BMDM isolated from 3 mice were pooled together to get enough biological material for all the studies. Cells were then allowed to rest for 48 hours. mRNA expression of markers of the classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages were measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to 36B4 mRNA levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 3 per condition. *p<0.05 versus control. (B) Impact of LPS on gene expression in macrophages isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. Cells isolated and differentiated as in A were treated with LPS (250ng/ml) for 10 hours. RNA expression was measured as described in A. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 3 per condition. *p<0.05 versus control. This experiment was performed 3 times with similar outcome. (C to E) Secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines by BMDM isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice in response to LPS. Cell culture media in which BMDM were incubated was collected and (C) TNF-α, (D) IL-12P40 and (E) IL-6 secretion levels were measured by ELISA. This measurement was repeated in another independent experiment and similar results were observed. (F) Impact of LPS on gene expression in Rictor +/+ and Rictor −/− MEFs. MEFs were plated 24 hours before the experimentation. The next day, cells were then treated with LPS (5ug/ml) for 10 hours. mRNA expression of several genes was measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to 36B4 mRNA levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 4 per condition. *p<0.05 versus control. This experiment was repeated once with similar outcome.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 mTORC2 loss exacerbates the pro-inflammatory profile of BMDM in response to several TLR agonists. (A to D) Impact of several TLR agonists on gene expression in macrophages isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. BMDM were isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice and were differentiated for 6 days in vitro. Cells were then plated and incubated 24 hours. Cells were then treated with (A) PAM3 (1ug/ml), (B) MALP2 (0.1ug/ml), (C) R848 (0.1uM), or CpG (0.5uM) for 8 hours. mRNA expression of markers of the classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages were measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to 36B4 mRNA levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 4 per condition. *p<0.05 versus control. This experiment was repeated twice and similar results were observed.
Figure 5 mTORC2 loss exacerbates the pro-inflammatory profile of BMDM in response to several TLR agonists. (A to D) Impact of several TLR agonists on gene expression in macrophages isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. BMDM were isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice and were differentiated for 6 days in vitro. Cells were then plated and incubated 24 hours. Cells were then treated with (A) PAM3 (1ug/ml), (B) MALP2 (0.1ug/ml), (C) R848 (0.1uM), or CpG (0.5uM) for 8 hours. mRNA expression of markers of the classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages were measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to 36B4 mRNA levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 4 per condition. *p<0.05 versus control. This experiment was repeated twice and similar results were observed.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 The pro-inflammatory profile induced by Rictor loss is not associated with consistent modulations in MAP kinase signalling and IKKα/β activation. (A) Impact of LPS on cell signalling in BMDM isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. BMDM were isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice and were differentiated for 6 days in vitro. Cells were then plated, incubated 24 hours and then treated with LPS (250ng/ml) for the indicated times. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. (B) Impact of LPS on cell signalling in Rictor +/+ and Rictor −/− MEFs. MEFs were plated 24 hours before the experimentation. The next day, cells were treated with LPS (5ug/ml) for the indicate time. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. (C–D) Impact of other TLR agonists on cell signalling in BMDM isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. Cells were isolated as described in A and were treated with either (C) R848 or (D) CpG for the indicated times. Protein were extracted and treated as described in A.
Figure 6 The pro-inflammatory profile induced by Rictor loss is not associated with consistent modulations in MAP kinase signalling and IKKα/β activation. (A) Impact of LPS on cell signalling in BMDM isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. BMDM were isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice and were differentiated for 6 days in vitro. Cells were then plated, incubated 24 hours and then treated with LPS (250ng/ml) for the indicated times. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. (B) Impact of LPS on cell signalling in Rictor +/+ and Rictor −/− MEFs. MEFs were plated 24 hours before the experimentation. The next day, cells were treated with LPS (5ug/ml) for the indicate time. Proteins were extracted and lysates were analysed by immunoblotting for indicated proteins. (C–D) Impact of other TLR agonists on cell signalling in BMDM isolated from LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice. Cells were isolated as described in A and were treated with either (C) R848 or (D) CpG for the indicated times. Protein were extracted and treated as described in A.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Myeloid-specific deletion of Rictor does not affect metabolic homeostasis in mice fed a low or a high-fat diet. (A–D) Body and tissue weight of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice fed a (A and C) low or (B a D) high fat diet for 21 and 23 weeks respectively. (E) Blood parameters of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice fed either a low or a high fat diet. Mice were fasted for 6 hours before blood collection. Ŧ denotes a significant difference between low fat fed and high fat fed mice (p<0.05). The p value for the genotype effect is indicated on the right side of the table. (F–G) GTT and ITT of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice fed with (F) low or (G) high fat diet. For the panels A to G, n = 6–13 mice per group. (H–I) Gene expression in (H) WAT and (I) liver of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice fed a low or a high fat diet. mRNA expression was measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to 36B4 mRNA levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 6–10 per condition. Ŧ denotes a significant difference between low fat fed and high fat fed mice (p<0.05). * denotes a significant difference between LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice (p<0.05).
Figure 7 Myeloid-specific deletion of Rictor does not affect metabolic homeostasis in mice fed a low or a high-fat diet. (A–D) Body and tissue weight of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice fed a (A and C) low or (B a D) high fat diet for 21 and 23 weeks respectively. (E) Blood parameters of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice fed either a low or a high fat diet. Mice were fasted for 6 hours before blood collection. Ŧ denotes a significant difference between low fat fed and high fat fed mice (p<0.05). The p value for the genotype effect is indicated on the right side of the table. (F–G) GTT and ITT of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice fed with (F) low or (G) high fat diet. For the panels A to G, n = 6–13 mice per group. (H–I) Gene expression in (H) WAT and (I) liver of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice fed a low or a high fat diet. mRNA expression was measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to 36B4 mRNA levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 6–10 per condition. Ŧ denotes a significant difference between low fat fed and high fat fed mice (p<0.05). * denotes a significant difference between LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice (p<0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 LysM-Rictor KO mice exhibit a higher susceptibility to LPS-induced septic shock. LysM-Rictor WT and LysM-Rictor KOmice were injected intraperitoneally with LPS (2.5 mg/kg of body weight) and body temperature was measured 4 hours post-injection. * denotes a significant difference between LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice (p<0.05). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 6–10 per condition. (B) Survival rate of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice following the injection of LPS. Mice having a core body temperature dropping down to 33.0+/−0.2°C or below following LPS injection were killed. (C) The sensitivity of LysM-Rictor KO mice to LPS-induced hypothermia is linked to an elevation in circulating levels of TNF-α. Plasma was collected from the mice used in the experimentation described in A before LPS injection and 1,2, and 4 hours post injection. TNF-α levels were measured by ELISA. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The graph presented in B is based on the plasma measurements of TNF-α of all LysM-Rictor WT mice (n = 6) vs. the LysM-Rictor KO mice that died over the experiment (n = 7). *p<0.05 versus control.
Figure 8 LysM-Rictor KO mice exhibit a higher susceptibility to LPS-induced septic shock. LysM-Rictor WT and LysM-Rictor KOmice were injected intraperitoneally with LPS (2.5 mg/kg of body weight) and body temperature was measured 4 hours post-injection. * denotes a significant difference between LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice (p<0.05). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for n = 6–10 per condition. (B) Survival rate of LysM-Rictor WT or LysM-Rictor KO mice following the injection of LPS. Mice having a core body temperature dropping down to 33.0+/−0.2°C or below following LPS injection were killed. (C) The sensitivity of LysM-Rictor KO mice to LPS-induced hypothermia is linked to an elevation in circulating levels of TNF-α. Plasma was collected from the mice used in the experimentation described in A before LPS injection and 1,2, and 4 hours post injection. TNF-α levels were measured by ELISA. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The graph presented in B is based on the plasma measurements of TNF-α of all LysM-Rictor WT mice (n = 6) vs. the LysM-Rictor KO mice that died over the experiment (n = 7). *p<0.05 versus control.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. S Gordon, 2003, Alternative activation of macrophages, Nat Rev Immunol, 3, 23, 10.1038/nri978 · DOI · Paper page
  2. T Kawai, 2010, The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors, Nat Immunol, 11, 373, 10.1038/ni.1863 · DOI · Paper page
  3. LA O’Neill, 2009, Therapeutic targeting of Toll-like receptors for infectious and inflammatory diseases and cancer, Pharmacol Rev, 61, 177, 10.1124/pr.109.001073 · DOI
  4. JM Olefsky, 2010, Macrophages, inflammation, and insulin resistance, Annu Rev Physiol, 72, 219, 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135846 · DOI · Paper page
  5. JA Engelman, 2006, The Role of the ErbB Family Members in Non-Small Cell “Lung Cancers Sensitive to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase Inhibitors”, Clin Cancer Res, 12, 4372s, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0795 · DOI
  6. BD Manning, 2007, AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream, Cell, 129, 1261, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
  7. J Brown, 2011, TLR-signaling networks: an integration of adaptor molecules, kinases, and cross-talk, J Dent Res, 90, 417, 10.1177/0022034510381264 · DOI
  8. K Hazeki, 2007, Role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase in innate immunity, Biol Pharm Bull, 30, 1617, 10.1248/bpb.30.1617 · DOI
  9. TD Troutman, 2012, Toll-like receptors, signaling adapters and regulation of the pro-inflammatory response by PI3K, Cell Cycle, 11, 3559, 10.4161/cc.21572 · DOI
  10. TD Troutman, 2012, Role for B-cell adapter for PI3K (BCAP) as a signaling adapter linking Toll-like receptors (TLRs) to serine/threonine kinases PI3K/Akt, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, 273, 10.1073/pnas.1118579109 · DOI
  11. L Arbibe, 2000, Toll-like receptor 2-mediated NF-kappa B activation requires a Rac1-dependent pathway, Nat Immunol, 1, 533, 10.1038/82797 · DOI
  12. SN Sarkar, 2004, Novel roles of TLR3 tyrosine phosphorylation and PI3 kinase in double-stranded RNA signaling, Nat Struct Mol Biol, 11, 1060, 10.1038/nsmb847 · DOI
  13. SH Rhee, 2006, Role of MyD88 in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation by flagellin/toll-like receptor 5 engagement in colonic epithelial cells, J Biol Chem, 281, 18560, 10.1074/jbc.M513861200 · DOI · Paper page
  14. M Ni, 2012, B-cell adaptor for PI3K (BCAP) negatively regulates Toll-like receptor signaling through activation of PI3K, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, 267, 10.1073/pnas.1111957108 · DOI
  15. J Brown, 2011, Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) negatively regulates Toll-like receptor 4-mediated inflammatory response via FoxO1, J Biol Chem, 286, 44295, 10.1074/jbc.M111.258053 · DOI
  16. VA McGuire, 2013, Cross Talk between the Akt and p38alpha Pathways in Macrophages Downstream of Toll-Like Receptor Signaling, Mol Cell Biol, 33, 4152, 10.1128/MCB.01691-12 · DOI
  17. M Ojaniemi, 2003, Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is involved in Toll-like receptor 4-mediated cytokine expression in mouse macrophages, Eur J Immunol, 33, 597, 10.1002/eji.200323376 · DOI
  18. B Chaurasia, 2010, Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 provides negative feedback inhibition to Toll-like receptor-mediated NF-kappaB activation in macrophages, Mol Cell Biol, 30, 4354, 10.1128/MCB.00069-10 · DOI
  19. A Arranz, 2012, Akt1 and Akt2 protein kinases differentially contribute to macrophage polarization, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, 9517, 10.1073/pnas.1119038109 · DOI
  20. M Laplante, 2012, mTOR signaling in growth control and disease, Cell, 149, 274, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  21. DA Guertin, 2006, Ablation in mice of the mTORC components raptor, rictor, or mLST8 reveals that mTORC2 is required for signaling to Akt-FOXO and PKCalpha, but not S6K1, Dev Cell, 11, 859, 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.007 · DOI
  22. C Shiota, 2006, Multiallelic disruption of the rictor gene in mice reveals that mTOR complex 2 is essential for fetal growth and viability, Dev Cell, 11, 583, 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.08.013 · DOI
  23. BE Clausen, 1999, Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice, Transgenic Res, 8, 265, 10.1023/A:1008942828960 · DOI · Paper page
  24. DR Alessi, 1997, Characterization of a 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase which phosphorylates and activates protein kinase Balpha, Curr Biol, 7, 261, 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00122-9 · DOI
  25. JM Garcia-Martinez, 2008, mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) controls hydrophobic motif phosphorylation and activation of serum- and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase 1 (SGK1), Biochem J, 416, 375, 10.1042/BJ20081668 · DOI · Paper page
  26. E Jacinto, 2006, SIN1/MIP1 maintains rictor-mTOR complex integrity and regulates Akt phosphorylation and substrate specificity, Cell, 127, 125, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.033 · DOI
  27. R Cancello, 2006, Increased infiltration of macrophages in omental adipose tissue is associated with marked hepatic lesions in morbid human obesity, Diabetes, 55, 1554, 10.2337/db06-0133 · DOI · Paper page
  28. H Xu, 2003, Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance, J Clin Invest, 112, 1821, 10.1172/JCI200319451 · DOI · Paper page
  29. GS Habicht, 1981, Body temperature in normal and endotoxin-treated mice of different ages, Mech Ageing Dev, 16, 97, 10.1016/0047-6374(81)90037-3 · DOI
  30. F Bauss, 1987, Tumor necrosis factor mediates endotoxic effects in mice, Infect Immun, 55, 1622, 10.1128/IAI.55.7.1622-1625.1987 · DOI
  31. M Martin, 2005, Toll-like receptor-mediated cytokine production is differentially regulated by glycogen synthase kinase 3, Nat Immunol, 6, 777, 10.1038/ni1221 · DOI
  32. W Fan, 2010, FoxO1 regulates Tlr4 inflammatory pathway signalling in macrophages, EMBO J, 29, 4223, 10.1038/emboj.2010.268 · DOI
  33. MF Siqueira, 2010, Impaired wound healing in mouse models of diabetes is mediated by TNF-alpha dysregulation and associated with enhanced activation of forkhead box O1 (FOXO1), Diabetologia, 53, 378, 10.1007/s00125-009-1529-y · DOI
  34. D Su, 2009, FoxO1 links insulin resistance to proinflammatory cytokine IL-1beta production in macrophages, Diabetes, 58, 2624, 10.2337/db09-0232 · DOI
  35. Y Kawano, 2012, Loss of Pdk1-Foxo1 signaling in myeloid cells predisposes to adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance, Diabetes, 61, 1935, 10.2337/db11-0770 · DOI
  36. R Cancello, 2006, Is obesity an inflammatory illness? Role of low-grade inflammation and macrophage infiltration in human white adipose tissue, Bjog, 113, 1141, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01004.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. K Cusi, 2010, The role of adipose tissue and lipotoxicity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, Curr Diab Rep, 10, 306, 10.1007/s11892-010-0122-6 · DOI
  38. SP Weisberg, 2003, Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue, J Clin Invest, 112, 1796, 10.1172/JCI200319246 · DOI · Paper page
  39. GS Hotamisligil, 2006, Inflammation and metabolic disorders, Nature, 444, 860, 10.1038/nature05485 · DOI · Paper page
  40. V Hietakangas, 2007, Re-evaluating AKT regulation: role of TOR complex 2 in tissue growth, Genes Dev, 21, 632, 10.1101/gad.416307 · DOI
  41. JP Luyendyk, 2008, Genetic analysis of the role of the PI3K-Akt pathway in lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine and tissue factor gene expression in monocytes/macrophages, J Immunol, 180, 4218, 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.4218 · DOI
  42. G Schabbauer, 2004, PI3K-Akt pathway suppresses coagulation and inflammation in endotoxemic mice, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 24, 1963, 10.1161/01.ATV.0000143096.15099.ce · DOI
  43. B Zou, 2012, Timing of insulin therapy affects the inflammatory response in endotoxemic rats, Inflammation, 35, 723, 10.1007/s10753-011-9367-8 · DOI
  44. MG Jeschke, 2004, Insulin attenuates the systemic inflammatory response in endotoxemic rats, Endocrinology, 145, 4084, 10.1210/en.2004-0592 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Festuccia, W. T., Pouliot, P., Bakan, I., Sabatini, D. M., & Laplante, M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-04-16
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
e95432
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
103
References
14
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review