Cited by 99Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Generalization of Human Fear Acquisition and Extinction within a Novel Arbitrary Stimulus Category

Open access
Vervoort, Ellen, Vervliet, Bram, Bennett, Marc, Baeyens, Frank·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Adaptive anxiety relies on a balance between the generalization of fear acquisition and fear extinction. Research on fear (extinction) generalization has focused mostly on perceptual similarity, thereby ignoring the importance of conceptual stimulus relations in humans. The present study used a laboratory procedure to create de novo conceptual categories of arbitrary stimuli and investigated fear and extinction generalization among these stimuli. A matching-to-sample task produced two four-member categories of abstract figures. Next, a member from one category was coupled with an aversive electrical stimulation, while a member from the other category was presented alone. As expected, conditioned fear responses generalized to the other members of the first category (skin conductance and online shock-expectancy). Subsequent extinction of the conditioned member also generalized to the other members. However, extinguishing a non-conditioned member failed to reduce fear of the conditioned member itself. We conclude that fears generalize readily across conceptually related stimuli, but that the degree of extinction generalization depends on the stimulus subjected to extinction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0096569

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is known that extinction of fear may readily spread through relational networks.

    “It is known however that extinction of fear may readily spread through relational networks (Vervoort et al., 2014).”

    From Relapse of anxiety-related fear and avoidance: Conceptual analysis of treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy (2020) · cites this paper as Vervoort et al., 2014

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that fear extinction generalized across conceptually related stimuli when the original conditioned stimulus was extinguished. It also says extinction remained rather stimulus-specific otherwise; extinguishing a related, non-conditioned stimulus did not significantly reduce fear of the original. The claim captures the possibility of spread but omits this important condition. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Extinction of fear to an original CS+ transferred to related stimuli, but extinguishing fear of a derived stimulus did not reduce fear of the original CS+.

    “These authors found that extinction of fear to an original CS+ transferred to related stimuli, but that extinguishing fear of a derived stimulus did not reduce fear of the original CS+.”
  • It has long been known that Pavlovian eliciting and operant avoidance functions, among others, may alter or transform in accordance with how events are related.

    “It has long been known that Pavlovian eliciting and operant avoidance functions, among others, may alter or transform in accordance with how events are related (Dougher, Augustson, Markham, Greenway, & Wulfert, 1994; Dymond & Rehfeldt, 2000; Vervoort, Vervliet, Bennett, & Baeyens, 2014).”

    From Relapse of anxiety-related fear and avoidance: Conceptual analysis of treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy (2020) · cites this paper as Vervoort, Vervliet, Bennett, & Baeyens, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [31]Barlow DH (2004) Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. 704 p.
  2. [32]Lang PJ (1993) The network model of emotion: Motivational connections. In: Wyer R, Srull T, editors. Advances in Social Cognition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. pp. 109–133.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vervoort, E., Vervliet, B., Bennett, M., & Baeyens, F.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Vervoort, Ellen
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-05-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e96569
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985365198
Cited by
97
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
KU Leuven (PF/10/005)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
fear extinction, fear generalization, fear conditioning, matching-to-sample, skin conductance, concept classification
MeSH terms
Adult, Conditioning, Classical, Electroshock, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review