Cited by 61Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Keep Calm and Carry On: Improved Frustration Tolerance and Processing Speed by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Open access
Plewnia, Christian, Schroeder, Philipp A., Kunze, Roland, Faehling, Florian, Wolkenstein, Larissa·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Cognitive control (CC) of attention is a major prerequisite for effective information processing. Emotional distractors can bias and impair goal-directed deployment of attentional resources. Frustration-induced negative affect and cognition can act as internal distractors with negative impact on task performance. Consolidation of CC may thus support task-oriented behavior under challenging conditions. Recently, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been put forward as an effective tool to modulate CC. Particularly, anodal, activity enhancing tDCS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) can increase insufficient CC in depression as indicated by a reduction of attentional biases induced by emotionally salient stimuli. With this study, we provide first evidence that, compared to sham stimulation, tDCS to the left dlPFC enhances processing speed measured by an adaptive version of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) that is typically thwarted by frustration. Notably, despite an even larger amount of error-related negative feedback, the task-induced upset was suppressed in the group receiving anodal tDCS. Moreover, inhibition of task-related negative affect was correlated with performance gains, suggesting a close link between enhanced processing speed and consolidation of CC by tDCS. Together, these data provide first evidence that activity enhancing anodal tDCS to the left dlPFC can support focused cognitive processing particularly when challenged by frustration-induced negative affect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0122578

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [35]Lejuez CW, Kahler CW, Brown RA. A modified computer version of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) as a laboratory-based stressor. Behav Ther. 2003; 26: 290– 293.
  2. [42]Krohne HW, Egloff B, Kohlmann C-W, Tausch A. Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS). / Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica. 1996; 42: 139– 156.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plewnia, C., Schroeder, P. A., Kunze, R., Faehling, F., & Wolkenstein, L.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Plewnia, Christian
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-04-02
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
e0122578
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029573440
Cited by
61
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ 01EE1403D, 01EE1403D, 2013-2-17)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, frustration tolerance, processing speed, cognitive control, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anodal tDCS, negative affect, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, attentional bias, emotional distractors
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cognition, Female, Frustration, Humans, Male, Task Performance and Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review