Cited by 380Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Enhancement of Planning Ability by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Open access
Dockery, Colleen A., Hueckel-Weng, Ruth, Birbaumer, Niels, Plewnia, Christian·2009·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The functional neuroanatomy of executive function critically involves the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been established as a noninvasive tool for transient modulation of cortical function. Here, we examined the effects of tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on planning function by using the Tower of London task to evaluate performance during and after anodal, cathodal (1 mA, 15 min), and sham tDCS in 24 healthy volunteers. The key finding was a double dissociation of polarity and training phase: improved performance was found with cathodal tDCS applied during acquisition and early consolidation, when preceding anodal tDCS, but not in the later training session. In contrast, anodal tDCS enhanced performance when applied in the later sessions following cathodal tDCS. Our results indicate that both anodal and cathodal tDCS can improve planning performance as quantified by the Tower of London test. Most importantly, these data demonstrate training-phase-specific effects of tDCS. We propose that excitability decreasing cathodal tDCS mediates its early beneficial effect through noise reduction of neuronal activity, whereas a further adaptive configuration of specific neuronal connections is supported by excitability enhancing anodal tDCS in the later training phase by enhanced efficacy of active connections. This gain of function was sustained in a follow-up 6 and 12 months after training. In conclusion, the specific coupling of stimulation and training phase interventions may support the treatment of cognitive disorders involving frontal lobe functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0065-09.2009

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthy people, tDCS alters inhibitory control, planning, delay discounting, and risk taking.

    “Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is another promising, low-risk, noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has effects on inhibitory control, planning, delay discounting, and risk taking in healthy individuals (289-291).”

    From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [289]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dockery, C. A., Hueckel-Weng, R., Birbaumer, N., & Plewnia, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • IRCCS San Camillo Hospital (IT)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-06-03
Volume
29
Issue
22
Pages
7271-7277
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2138140054
Cited by
380
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 20
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 550)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, executive function, planning, Tower of London task, anodal stimulation, cathodal stimulation, polarity effect, training stages, cognitive training
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Learning, Male, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review