Cited by 74Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPain Management and Placebo Effect

Spirituality in pain medicine: A randomized experiment of pain perception, heart rate and religious spiritual well-being by using a single session meditation methodology

Open access
Sollgruber, Anja, Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar, Szilagyi, Istvan-Szilard, Sandner-Kiesling, Andreas·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate different effects on pain perception among randomly assigned volunteers practicing meditation compared to a relaxation condition. The study examines whether participants of the experimental conditions (meditation versus relaxation) differ in the change of pain perception and heart rate measurement and in religious and spiritual well-being after an intervention. METHOD: 147 volunteers (long-term practitioners and novices) were randomly assigned to the experimental conditions with a headphone guided 20-minute single session intervention. The change in their pre- and post-intervention pain perception was measured using Quantitative Sensory Testing and Cold Pressor Testing (CPTest), their stress-level was compared by monitoring heart rate, and their religious and spiritual well-being by using the Multidimensional Inventory for Religious/Spiritual Well-Being (MI-RSB48). Additionally, dimensions of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) measured the psychological resilience of the participants; pain and stress experience, and the state of relaxation and spirituality experience were assessed. Five persons were excluded due to failure in measuring the heart rate and 29 participants had to be excluded because of high values on the BSI. RESULTS: The meditation group showed an increase in their pain tolerance on the CPTest and a decrease in their pain intensity for heat after the experimental condition, in contrast to the relaxation group. Futhermore, the meditation group showed a higher level of religious spiritual well-being (MI-RSB48 Total score) as well as in the sub-dimensions General Religiosity, Forgiveness, and Connectedness after the experimental condition, compared to the relaxation group. Our data is consistent with the hypothesis that meditation increases pain tolerance and reduces pain intensity, however, further work is required to determine whether meditation contains similar implications for pain patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0203336

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [9]Nilges P. Klinische Schmerzmessung In: Baron R, Koppert W, Strupf M, Willweber- Strumpf A, editors. Praktische Schmerzmedizin. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2013 pp. 79– 87.
  2. [17]Wachholtz AB. Does Spirituality matter? Effects of Meditative Content and orientation on Migaineurs. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Bowling Green State University. 2006. Available from: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=bgsu1143662175&disposition=inline
  3. [31]Barnett JE, Shale AJ. The Integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Into the Practice of Psychology: A Vision for the Future Professional Psychology. Research and Practice. 2006; 43: 576– 585.
  4. [72]Unterrainer HF, Huber HP, Ladenhauf K, Wallner-Liebmann S, Liebmann P. MI-RSB 48—Die Entwicklung eines multidimensionalen Inventars zum religiös-spirituellen Befinden. Diagnostica. 2010; 56: 82– 93.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sollgruber, A., Bornemann-Cimenti, H., Szilagyi, I.-S., & Sandner-Kiesling, A.
Affiliations
University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Sollgruber, Anja
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-09-07
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
e0203336
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890423583
Cited by
74
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
meditation, pain perception, pain tolerance, pain intensity, heart rate, stress, relaxation, guided meditation, forgiveness, connectedness, religiosity, pain patients, psychological resilience
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Pain, Pain Measurement, Relaxation Therapy, Pain Threshold, Meditation, Spirituality, Young Adult, Pain Perception, Pain Management, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review