Cited by 78Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesEating Disorders and BehaviorsAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Eating as an autistic adult: an exploratory qualitative study

Open access
Kinnaird, Emma, Norton, Caroline, Pimblett, Caroline, Stewart, Catherine, Tchanturia, Kate·2019·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although eating difficulties are known to be common in children on the autism spectrum, there is a lack of research on whether these behaviours persist or change into adulthood. Emerging evidence suggests that autistic adults may experience higher levels of disordered eating than the general population, indicating the impact of autism on eating in this adult population warrants further exploration. METHOD: This study interviewed 12 autistic adults about their eating habits, with a focus on the continuing or changing presence of behaviours often seen in autistic children such as sensory sensitivity or a preference for routines. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Overall, participants suggested that autism did continue to impact their eating into adulthood, particularly in the areas of sensory sensitivity, medical difficulties, executive functioning difficulties, and rigidity, but that they had learned to adapt so that these issues no longer represented a problem. However, a minority of participants did feel that their autism had a negative effect on their eating, particularly those diagnosed with eating disorders. Additionally, eating behaviours associated with autism were identified as potentially contributing to having an unhealthy body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Certain traits associated with autism, such as cognitive rigidity and sensory sensitivity, could potentially continue to influence the eating behaviours of autistic adults. These traits are typically experienced as differences which can be adapted around and managed, rather than specific problems. However, these traits can potentially contribute to difficulties such as disordered eating and weight gain, and the implications of these should be explored by future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0221937

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In eating disorders, rigid thinking is often exacerbated in autistic individuals and may contribute to eating disorder pathology.

    “In eating disorders, rigid thinking is often exacerbated in autistic individuals and may contribute to eating disorder pathology [58].”

    From Autistic Cognition: Charting Routes to Anxiety (2021) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Results (Unifying theme: Impact) link rigidity associated with autism to under- or overeating and, for some participants, the development of eating disorders. The paper does not establish that rigid thinking is often exacerbated in autistic individuals with eating disorders; it describes rigidity as an autism-associated trait and reports participants’ perceptions of its effects. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Dias EC, Rocha JS, Ferreira GB, Pena GD. Gluten-free and casein-free diet in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Revista Cuidarte. 2018; 9(1): 2059– 73. 10.15649/cuidarie.v9i1.485 PubMed PMID: WOS:000437491400010. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kinnaird, E., Norton, C., Pimblett, C., Stewart, C., & Tchanturia, K.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Ilia State University (GE)
Corresponding author
Tchanturia, Kate
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2019-08-29
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
e0221937
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970888915
Cited by
78
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N013700/1)
  • MRC and MRF Child and Young Adult Mental Health (MR/R004595/1)
  • Health Foundation (-)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, eating behaviour, disordered eating, sensory sensitivity, cognitive rigidity, eating disorders, body weight, transition from childhood to adulthood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Diet, Disease Susceptibility, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review