Cited by 84Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNutritional Studies and Diet

Dietary adequacy of children with autism compared with controls and the impact of restricted diet

Open access
Graf-Myles, Jennifer, Farmer, Cristan, Thurm, Audrey, Royster, Caitlin, Kahn, Phoebe, Soskey, Laura, Rothschild, Leah, Swedo, Susan·2013·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Children with autism (AUT) may consume a restricted diet relative to typical peers, whether due to therapeutic measures or sensory sensitivities. The objective of this study was to compare children with AUT with both typically developing (TYP) and developmentally delayed children on nutrient and food group intake and overall diet quality and to evaluate the impact of diet restriction. METHODS: Three-day food records and interview information were analyzed from 69 children with AUT, 14 children with developmental delay, and 37 TYP children, drawn from a larger longitudinal study. RESULTS: Children with AUT did not differ significantly from children with other developmental delays on any dietary measures. Although there were differences in the average intake of some nutrients between AUT and typical controls, only calcium and dairy were also less likely to be consumed in adequate amounts by the AUT group. Intentional diet restriction accounted for most of the differences between AUT and typical controls. On average, all groups had inadequate fiber, vitamin D, and vegetable intake. Inadequate intake of folate, grains, and dairy was noted for the AUT subgroup with intentional diet restrictions. Children in the AUT group not following a restricted diet received significantly worse Healthy Eating Index-2005 scores than those following a restricted diet and typical controls. These differences were not nutritionally significant. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating nutritional adequacy of children with AUT, special consideration should be given to calcium, folate, dairy, and grains. Diets of all children with AUT should be evaluated for idiosyncratic deficiencies because of unique dietary patterns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dbp.0b013e3182a00d17

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large proportion of both groups did not meet the dietary recommended intake for vitamin D (88% of children with ASD and 75% of typically developing children, p = 0.16), a finding confirmed by others.

    “A large proportion of both groups did not meet the dietary recommended intake for vitamin D (88% of children with ASD and 75% of typically developing children, p = 0.16), a finding confirmed by others [137,138].”

    From Vitamin D and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Literature Review (2016) · cites this paper as [137]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Otten JJ Hellwig JP Meyers LD DRI, Dietary Reference Intakes: The Essential Guide to Nutrient Requirements National Academies Press 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graf-Myles, J., Farmer, C., Thurm, A., Royster, C., Kahn, P., Soskey, L., Rothschild, L., & Swedo, S.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2013-09
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
449-459
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149205957
Cited by
84
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Rural Development Administration
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (Z01MH002868)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, nutritional adequacy, restrictive diets, nutrient intake, food group intake, diet quality, Healthy Eating Index-2005, calcium intake, dairy consumption, folic acid, fibers, vitamin D, vegetable consumption, grain consumption, developmental delay, sensory sensitivity, children
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Caseins, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Diet, Diet Surveys, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Case-Control Studies, Soybean Proteins, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review