Cited by 632Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Cognitive, language, social and behavioural outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review of longitudinal follow-up studies in adulthood

Magiati, Iliana, Tay, Xiang Wei, Howlin, Patricia·2014·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Background Although increasing numbers of children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are now entering adolescence and adulthood, there is limited research on outcomes post childhood. A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted.Method PsycINFO, PubMed, MedLine and CINAHL were systematically searched using keywords related to ASD and adolescent and adult outcomes. Studies of individuals diagnosed with ASD in childhood and followed up into adulthood were identified and reviewed. Only studies with samples sizes >10, mean age at outcome >16 years and at least one previous assessment in childhood (<16 years) were included.Results Twenty-five studies meeting criteria were identified. Reported outcomes in adulthood were highly variable across studies. Although social functioning, cognitive ability and language skills remained relatively stable in some studies, others reported deterioration over time. Adaptive functioning tended to improve in most studies. Diagnosis of autism or ASD was generally stable, although severity of autism-related behavioural symptoms was often reported to improve. Childhood IQ and early language ability appeared to be the strongest predictors of later outcome, but few studies examined other early variables associated with adult functioning.Discussion Implications of the findings are discussed in relation to methodological challenges in longitudinal outcome research and future research directions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.11.002

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Language ability and cognitive function vary widely in ASD and predict later outcome.

    “Language abilities and cognitive function, two domains strongly affecting adaptive behavior (2,3) and predicting later outcome (4), also have a broad range in ASD.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magiati, I., Tay, X. W., & Howlin, P.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Magiati, Iliana
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
73-86
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089468865
Cited by
632
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 13
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, adult outcomes, longitudinal follow-up, cognitive ability, language skills, social functioning, adaptive behavior, behavioural symptoms, IQ
MeSH terms
Adult, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Cognition, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Language, Social Adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review