Cited by 261Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Real-world executive functions in adults with autism spectrum disorder: profiles of impairment and associations with adaptive functioning and co-morbid anxiety and depression

Open access
Wallace, Gregory L., Kenworthy, Lauren, Pugliese, Cara E., Popal, Haroon S., White, Emily I., Brodsky, Emily, Martin, Alex·2016·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Although executive functioning (EF) difficulties are well documented among children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), little is known about real-world measures of EF among adults with ASD. Therefore, this study examined parent-reported real-world EF problems among 35 adults with ASD without intellectual disability and their correlations with adaptive functioning and co-morbid anxiety and depression symptomatology. A variable EF profile was found with prominent deficits occurring in flexibility and metacognition. Flexibility problems were associated with anxiety-related symptoms while metacognition difficulties were associated with depression symptoms and impaired adaptive functioning (though the metacognition-adaptive functioning relationship was moderated by ADHD symptoms). These persistent EF problems are predictors of broader functioning and therefore remain an important treatment target among adults with ASD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-015-2655-7

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Difficulties with habituation and flexibility, associated with disrupted integration between mPFC and limbic regions, can be treated directly with benefits for anxiety and depression.

    “Difficulties with habituation and flexibility, associated with disrupted integration between mPFC and limbic regions, can also be treated directly with benefits for anxiety and depression (Kenworthy et al., 2014; Lawson et al., 2015; Wallace et al., 2016).”

    From Sensory, emotional and cognitive contributions to anxiety in autism spectrum disorders (2017) · cites this paper as Wallace et al., 2016

    The Results and Discussion report an association between inflexibility and anxiety in adults with ASD, and identify executive-function difficulties as a potential treatment target (page numbers unavailable). But the Discussion explicitly says whether such treatment benefits anxiety or depression remains unknown. The paper does not establish habituation difficulties or disrupted mPFC–limbic integration as the mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harrison PL Oakland T 2003 Adaptive behavior assessment—Second edition manual (ABAS-II) San Antonio, TX Harcourt Assessment
  2. Sparrow SS Cicchetti D Balla DA 2005 Vineland adaptive behavior scales— 2nd edition manual Minneapolis, MN NCS Pearson Inc

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallace, G. L., Kenworthy, L., Pugliese, C. E., Popal, H. S., White, E. I., Brodsky, E., & Martin, A.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Children's National (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Corresponding author
Wallace, Gregory L.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2015-11-16
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
1071-1083
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2172314818
Cited by
261
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 9
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1-ZIA-MH002920)
  • National Institutes of Health (HD046388-01A2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
executive function, autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, adaptive behavior, anxiety, depression, metacognition, cognitive flexibility, ADHD comorbidity, real-world functioning
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Comorbidity, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review