The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity and Specificity of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Scanning by High-Resolution Melting Analysis
Abstract
Background: Screening for heterozygous sequence changes in PCR products, also known as “mutation scanning”, is an important tool for genetic research and clinical applications. Conventional methods require a separation step. Methods: We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of homogeneous scanning, using a saturating DNA dye and high-resolution melting. Heterozygous single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection was studied in three different sequence backgrounds of 40%, 50%, and 60% GC content. PCR products of 50–1000 bp were generated in the presence of LCGreen™ I. After fluorescence normalization and temperature overlay, melting curve shape was used to judge the presence or absence of heterozygotes among 1632 cases. Results: For PCR products of 300 bp or less, all 280 heterozygous and 296 wild-type cases were correctly called without error. In 672 cases between 400 and 1000 bp with the mutation centered, the sensitivity and specificity were 96.1% and 99.4%, respectively. When the sequence background and product size with the greatest error rate were used, the sensitivity of off-center SNPs (384 cases) was 95.6% with a specificity of 99.4%. Most false negatives occurred with SNPs that were compared with an A or T wild type sequence. Conclusions: High-resolution melting analysis with the dye LCGreen I identifies heterozygous single-base changes in PCR products with a sensitivity and specificity comparable or superior to nonhomogeneous techniques. The error rate of scanning depends on the PCR product size and the type of base change, but not on the position of the SNP. The technique requires only PCR reagents, the dye LCGreen I, and 1–2 min of closed-tube, post-PCR analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy Assessment
Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.175 · Cited by 6,967
Orita, M., Iwahana, H., Kanazawa, H., Hayashi, K., & Sekiya, T. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.8.2766 · Cited by 3,610
High-Resolution Genotyping by Amplicon Melting Analysis Using LCGreen
Wittwer, C. T., Reed, G. H., Gundry, C. N., Vandersteen, J. G., & Pryor, R. J. (2003) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/49.6.853 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationDenaturing high-performance liquid chromatography: A review
Xiao, W., & Oefner, P. J. (2001) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.1130 · Cited by 725
Genotyping of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms by High-Resolution Melting of Small Amplicons
Liew, M., Pryor, R., Palais, R., Meadows, C., Erali, M., Lyon, E., & Wittwer, C. (2004) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2004.032136 · Cited by 660
Self-citationLerman, L. S., & Silverstein, K. (1987) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(87)55032-7 · Cited by 483
Gundry, C. N., Vandersteen, J. G., Reed, G. H., Pryor, R. J., Chen, J., & Wittwer, C. T. (2003) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/49.3.396 · Cited by 361
Self-citationReal-time fluorescence genotyping of factor V Leiden during rapid-cycle PCR
Lay, M. J., & Wittwer, C. T. (1997) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/43.12.2262 · Cited by 331
Self-citationCrockett, A. O., & Wittwer, C. T. (2001) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.2000.4957 · Cited by 238
Self-citationMolecular microbiology: diagnostic principles and practice.
Persing, D. H., & Tenover, F. C. (2011) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 205
Cited by
High-Resolution DNA Melting Analysis for Simple and Efficient Molecular Diagnostics
Reed, G. H., Kent, J. O., & Wittwer, C. T. (2007) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/14622416.8.6.597 · Cited by 678
Self-citationHigh-Resolution Melting Analysis (HRMA)-More than just sequence variant screening
Vossen, R. H. A. M., Aten, E., Roos, A., & den Dunnen, J. T. (2009) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.21019 · Cited by 484
High-resolution DNA melting analysis: advancements and limitations
Wittwer, C. T. (2009) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20951 · Cited by 468
Self-citationHerrmann, M. G., Durtschi, J. D., Bromley, L. K., Wittwer, C. T., & Voelkerding, K. V. (2006) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2005.063438 · Cited by 279
Self-citationMass spectral determination of fasting tear glucose concentrations in nondiabetic volunteers
Baca, J. T., Taormina, C. R., Feingold, E., Finegold, D. N., Grabowski, J. J., & Asher, S. A. (2007) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.078543 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, G. H., & Wittwer, C. T.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-10-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1748-1754
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2163350392
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity and Specificity of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Scanning by High-Resolution Melting Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2003.029751
- The paper
- Reed, G. H., & Wittwer, C. T. (2004). Sensitivity and Specificity of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Scanning by High-Resolution Melting Analysis. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2003.029751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.