Cited by 41Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Cognitive Profile for Children with ADHD by Using WISC-IV: Subtype Differences? // Detección de perfiles cognitivos mediante WISC-IV en niños diagnosticados de TDAH: ¿Existen diferencias entre subtipos?

Open access
Fenollar-Cortés, Javier, Navarro-Soria, Ignasi, González-Gómez, Carla, García-Sevilla, Julia·2014·Revista de Psicodidactica / Journal of Psychodidactics

Abstract

El presente estudio explora si se puede obtener un perfil cognitivo específico para niños/as con TDAH a partir de la Escala de Inteligencia Wechsler para Niños Cuarta Edición (WISC-IV), y si ese perfil es capaz de diferenciar entre los subtipos clínicos de TDAH. Se seleccionó un grupo de control de 47 niños/as y otro grupo clínico de 86 niños/as diagnosticados/as con TDAH, éste último dividido a su vez en dos subgrupos de acuerdo a sus características clínicas. El grupo clínico se caracterizó por una puntuación ICG>ICC respecto al grupo de control. Los subgrupos clínicos no obtuvieron puntuaciones significativamente diferentes en ninguno de los índices, pero sí lo hicieron respecto a la distancia entre el Índice de Memoria de Trabajo y el Índice de Velocidad de Procesamiento. Para el subgrupo TDAH predominantemente inatento esta distancia fue positiva, mientras que para el subgrupo TDAH-combinado fue negativa. Estos resultados aportan evidencia empírica a la hipótesis de la existencia de un perfil cognitivo específico del TDAH, con potencial para discriminar entre subtipos clínicos de TDAH.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1387/revpsicodidact.12531

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Fair, D. A., Bathula, D., Nikolas, M. A., y Nigg, J. T. (2012). Distinct neuropsy- Y JULIA GARCÍA-SEVILLA Revista de Psicodidáctica, 2015, 20(1), 157-176
  2. chological subgroups in typically de- veloping youth inform heterogeneity in children with ADHD. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencies, 109(17), 6768-6774.
  3. González-Castro, P., Rodríguez, C., Cueli, M., Cabeza, L., y Álvarez, L. (2014). Competencias matemáticas y control ejecutivo en estudiantes con trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactivi- dad y dificultades de aprendizaje de las matemáticas. Revista de Psicodidác- tica, 19(1), 125-143. doi: 10.1387/Rev Psicodidac.7510 · DOI
  4. Sattler, J. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler. Y JULIA GARCÍA-SEVILLA Revista de Psicodidáctica, 2015, 20(1), 157-176
  5. Schwean, V. L. y McCrimmon, A. (2008). Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disor- der: Using the WISC-IV to inform in- tervention planning. En A. Prifitera, D. Saklofske, y L. Weiss, (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical assessment and intervention (pp. 193-215). San Diego, CA: Aca- demic Press.
  6. Servera, M., y Cardo, E. (2007). ADHD Rating Scale-IV in a sample of Spanish schoolchidren: Normalitive data and internal consistency for teachers and parents. Revista de Neurología, 45(7), 393-399.
  7. Skounti, M., Philatithis, A., y Galanakis, E. (2007). Variations in prevalence of At- tention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder world wide. European Journal Pediat- ric, 166, 117-123.
  8. Stefanatos, G., y Baron, I. (2007). Atten- tion-Deficit/Hiperactivity Disorder: A neuropsychological perspective to- wards DMS-V. Neuropsychological Review, 17, 35-38.
  9. Styck, K. M., y Watkins, M. W. (2014). Structural validity of the WISC-IV Revista de Psicodidáctica, 2015, 20(1), 157-176
  10. Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-four edition. San Antonio, TS: Psychological Corpora- tion.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenollar-Cortés, J., Navarro-Soria, I., González-Gómez, C., & García-Sevilla, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Murcia (ES)
  • University of Alicante (ES)
Venue
Revista de Psicodidactica / Journal of Psychodidactics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11-24
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
157-176
ISSN
  • 1136-1034 (ISSN-L)
  • 2254-4372
OpenAlex
W1798143858
Cited by
39
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Revista de Psicodidáctica (publishedVersion)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cognitive profile, WISC-IV, ADHD subtypes, inattentive type ADHD, combined type ADHD, working memory, processing speed, intelligence quotient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review