Cited by 203Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 99 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Senolytic Therapy to Modulate the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease (SToMP-AD): A Pilot Clinical Trial

Open access
Gonzales, Mitzi M., Garbarino, V.R., Marques Zilli, E., Petersen, R.C., Kirkland, J.L., Tchkonia, T., Musi, N., Seshadri, S., Craft, S., Orr, Miranda E.·2022·The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Preclinical studies indicate an age-associated accumulation of senescent cells across multiple organ systems. Emerging evidence suggests that tau protein accumulation, which closely correlates with cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies, drives cellular senescence in the brain. Pharmacologically clearing senescent cells in mouse models of tauopathy reduced brain pathogenesis. Compared to vehicle treated mice, intermittent senolytic administration reduced tau accumulation and neuroinflammation, preserved neuronal and synaptic density, restored aberrant cerebral blood flow, and reduced ventricular enlargement. Intermittent dosing of the senolytics, dasatinib plus quercetin, has shown an acceptable safety profile in clinical studies for other senescence-associated conditions. With these data, we proposed and herein describe the objectives and methods for a clinical vanguard study. This initial open-label clinical trial pilots an intermittent senolytic combination therapy of dasatinib plus quercetin in five older adults with early-stage Alzheimer's disease. The primary objective is to evaluate the central nervous system penetration of dasatinib and quercetin through analysis of cerebrospinal fluid collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Further, through a series of secondary outcome measures to assess target engagement of the senolytic compounds and Alzheimer's disease-relevant cognitive, functional, and physical outcomes, we will collect preliminary data on safety, feasibility, and efficacy. The results of this study will be used to inform the development of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter phase II trial to further explore of the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of senolytics for modulating the progression of Alzheimer's disease. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number and date: NCT04063124 (08/21/2019).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14283/jpad.2021.62

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 99 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 28 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 20
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
28 of 28
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of dasatinib and quercetin reflect central nervous system penetration of these drugs.

    “The primary objective is to evaluate the central nervous system penetration of dasatinib and quercetin through analysis of cerebrospinal fluid collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The central nervous system drug penetrance of D+Q in individuals with AD is unknown.

    “While it has been shown that D and/or Q can cross the blood barrier in rodent models and individuals undergoing cancer treatment, the central nervous system drug penetrance in individuals with AD remains unknown (41, 42).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cellular senescence has not been examined in clinical trials of aMCI or early-stage AD.

    “However, as no clinical trials of aMCI and early-stage AD have examined cellular senescence, it is possible that the treatment regimen will affect various cellular and molecular senescence markers, which will be determined though exploratory analyses of a broader panel of senescence markers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    D+Q is the most well-established senolytic.

    “Though there are several senolytic compounds which have been identified and are being further studied (e.g., fisetin and other flavonoids) for their associations with improvements in cognition and reductions in AD-relevant pathology (36, 49–52), D+Q was selected for use in this first AD relevant trial as it is the most well established.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The stated drug-free interval does not fit the two-week cycle

    Minor

    Two dosing days followed by 14 no-drug days make a 16-day cycle. That conflicts with the stated two-week cycle and visits scheduled 14 days apart, affecting the treatment schedule.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 65 references

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kantarjian, 2006, Dasatinib, 717

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–102 of 102

Metadata

Authors
Gonzales, M. M., Garbarino, V. R., Marques Zilli, E., Petersen, R. C., Kirkland, J. L., Tchkonia, T., Musi, N., Seshadri, S., Craft, S., & Orr, M. E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gonzales, Mitzi M.
  • Orr, Miranda E.
Venue
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
22-29
ISSN
2274-5807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3216516063
Cited by
203
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 18
FWCI
18.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2BX003804)
  • National Institute on Aging (R33AG061456, P30AG013319, U24AG059624, R01AG068293, P30AG044271)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
senolytic therapy, Alzheimer's disease, dasatinib, quercetin, cellular senescence, tau accumulation, tauopathy, intermittent dosing, cerebrospinal fluid drug penetration, neuroinflammation, cognitive decline, early Alzheimer's disease, older adults
MeSH terms
Dasatinib, Senotherapeutics, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Humans, Cellular Senescence, Tauopathies, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review