The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Social Responsibility in Business-to-Business Markets: How Organizational Customers Account for Supplier Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement
Abstract
Despite the high relevance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in current business practice and the considerable research on CSR outcomes in consumer markets, investigations of its influence on organizational business relationships are scarce. Relying on instrumental stakeholder theory, the authors develop and empirically test a framework of the influence of a supplier's CSR engagement on organizational customer outcomes. Findings from an examination of 200 cross-industry supplier–customer dyads reveal positive effects of two facets of a supplier's CSR efforts on customer loyalty through distinct mechanisms. Business practice CSR fosters customers' trust, whereas philanthropic CSR strengthens customer–company identification. The authors distinguish a supplier's actual CSR engagement and customers' perception of these CSR activities. In addition, they consider central contingency factors reflecting uncertainty and dependence in business-to-business relationships that determine the effectiveness of CSR.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some studies have empirically shown that organizations paying attention to multiple stakeholders perform better (e.g., Homburg et al. 2013;Koll et al. 2005;Luo and Bhattacharya 2009;Sisodia et al. 2007).”
From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Homburg et al. 2013
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 · Cited by 10,068
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Kemp, F. (2003) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9884.2003.t01-2-00383_4.x · Cited by 9,294
Carroll, A. B. (1991) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-g · Cited by 9,036
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- BASF, 2012, BASF Report 2011.
- 10.2307/256972 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224299706100106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224299706100203 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.2000.2791606 · DOI
- Hult G. Tomas M., 2011, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 44
- 10.1177/002224379503200309 · DOI
- Levy Piet, 2010, Marketing News, 20
- 10.2307/256342 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkg.70.1.119.qxd · DOI
- 10.1177/002224299606000203 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 · Cited by 1,923
Hollebeek, L. D., Srivastava, R. K., & Chen, T. (2016) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0494-5 · Cited by 1,127
Bocken, N. M. P., & Geradts, T. (2019) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950 · Cited by 994
Corporate digital responsibility
Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M., & Wirtz, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 · Cited by 573
Green Claims and Message Frames: How Green New Products Change Brand Attitude
Olsen, M. C., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Chandukala, S. R. (2014) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.13.0387 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Homburg, C., Stierl, M., & Bornemann, T.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 54-72
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2119493092
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 67.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
- MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Keywords
- corporate social responsibility, business-to-business relationships, supplier-customer relationships, organizational customers, customer loyalty, instrumental stakeholder theory, philanthropic CSR, consumer trust, customer-company identification, contingency factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
