Cited by 786Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyInformation and Cyber Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data Privacy: Effects on Customer and Firm Performance

Abstract

Although marketers increasingly rely on customer data, firms have little insight into the ramifications of such data use and do not know how to prevent negative effects. Data management efforts may heighten customers’ vulnerability worries or create real vulnerability. Using a conceptual framework grounded in gossip theory, the authors link customer vulnerability to negative performance effects. Three studies show that transparency and control in firms’ data management practices can suppress the negative effects of customer data vulnerability. Experimental manipulations reveal that mere access to personal data inflates feelings of violation and reduces trust. An event study of data security breaches affecting 414 public companies also confirms negative effects, as well as spillover vulnerabilities from rival firms’ breaches, on firm performance. Severity of the breach hurts the focal firm but helps the rival firm, which provides some insight into mixed findings in prior research. Finally, a field study with actual customers of 15 companies across three industries demonstrates consistent effects across four types of customer data vulnerability and confirms that violation and trust mediate the effects of data vulnerabilities on outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jm.15.0497

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Acquisti Alessandro, 2006, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Information Systems, 94
  2. 10.1509/jmr.09.0215 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.2307/25148715 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.133 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.111 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00956.x · DOI
  8. BiesdorfStefan, CourtDavid, and WillmottPaul (2013), “Big Data: What's Your Plan?” McKinsey Quarterly (March), http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/big-data-whats-your-plan.
  9. 10.1287/mksc.2013.0818 · DOI
  10. 10.1509/jmr.13.0009 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.016 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s10799-005-5879-y · DOI
  13. 10.1509/jm.10.0414 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/1096348004265027 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.007 · DOI
  16. 10.1509/jmr.11.0136 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/2096270 · DOI
  19. Emler Nicholas, 1994, Good Gossip, 119
  20. 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00026-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/a0026650 · DOI
  22. Fisher John A., 2013, William & Mary Business Law Review, 215, 217
  23. 10.1007/s11002-006-3796-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s11747-007-0054-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1509/jm.12.0179 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/THS.2015.7225301 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Iyengar Sheena, 2010, The Art of Choosing
  29. 10.1086/656423 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ko Myung, 2006, Journal of Information Technology Management, 17, 13
  31. 10.1509/jmr.13.0169 · DOI
  32. 10.1017/CBO9780511770548.003 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s11747-006-0003-3 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/1094670510383409 · DOI
  35. 10.1287/isre.1040.0032 · DOI · Paper page
  36. McAfee Andrew, 2012, Harvard Business Review, 3
  37. 10.2307/257056 · DOI
  38. Mills Colleen, 2010, Group & Organization Management, 35, 371, 10.1177/1059601109360389 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2004.tb00865.x · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jom.2011.01.002 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/1094670511424924 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1509/jmkg.72.4.076 · DOI
  43. 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Ponemon Institute, 2015, 2015 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis
  45. 10.1509/jmr.09.0317 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/pam.20567 · DOI
  47. Scharf S., 2007, Internal Auditor, 64, 23
  48. 10.1108/ICS-03-2014-0020 · DOI
  49. 10.1509/jmkg.70.2.133 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1509/jm.11.0316 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1080/07421222.2015.1063315 · DOI
  52. Sharpe William F., 1964, Journal of Finance, 19, 425
  53. 10.1177/1088868314530515 · DOI
  54. 10.1177/002224299706100301 · DOI
  55. Solove Daniel J., 2003, Hastings Law Journal, 54, 1
  56. 10.1509/jmkg.75.3.49 · DOI
  57. 10.1509/jmkr.46.3.293 · DOI
  58. 10.1080/0363775032000133782 · DOI
  59. 10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_6 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 656

Metadata

Authors
Martin, K. D., Borah, A., & Palmatier, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2017-01
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
36-58
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2495772237
Cited by
786
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 13
FWCI
89.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Colorado State University
  • Marketing Science Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
data privacy, data management practices, consumer trust, data breaches, firm performance, customer performance, transparency, data control, spillover effects, rival firms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review