Cited by 232Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactConsumer behavior in food and health

The squander sequence: Understanding food waste at each stage of the consumer decision-making process

Block, Lauren G., Keller, Punam A., Vallen, Beth, Williamson, Sara, Birau, Mia M., Grinstein, Amir, Haws, Kelly L., LaBarge, Monica C. +5 more·2016·Journal of Public Policy & Marketing

Abstract

Food waste presents a complex global problem that involves multiple actors and institutions within the aggregate food marketing system. Food waste occurs across food production and distribution, as well as at the hands of the consumer. In this research, the authors focus on waste that occurs across what is termed the “squander sequence,” which describes waste that occurs from consumer behaviors at the preacquisition, acquisition, consumption, and disposition stages. The authors set forth a behavioral theory–based agenda to explain food waste in the squander sequence with the ultimate goals of encouraging future research to uncover the psychological underpinnings of consumer-level food waste and of deriving transformative consumer solutions to this substantive issue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jppm.15.132

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Block, L. G., Keller, P. A., Vallen, B., Williamson, S., Birau, M. M., Grinstein, A., Haws, K. L., LaBarge, M. C., Lamberton, C., Moore, E. S., Moscato, E. M., Reczek, R. W., & Tangari, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Baruch College (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Villanova University (US)
  • Saint Joseph's University (US)
  • Grenoble Ecole de Management (FR)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Block, Lauren G.
  • Keller, Punam A.
  • Vallen, Beth
  • Williamson, Sara
  • Birau, Mia M.
  • Grinstein, Amir
  • Haws, Kelly L.
  • LaBarge, Monica C.
  • Lamberton, Cait
  • Moore, Elizabeth S.
  • Moscato, Emily M.
  • Reczek, Rebecca Walker
  • Tangari, Andrea Heintz
Venue
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Published
2016-09
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
292-304
ISSN
  • 0743-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7207
OpenAlex
W2488723297
Cited by
231
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 7
FWCI
23.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
food waste, purchase decision, consumer behavior, food procurement, dietary intake, food disposal, food marketing system, behavioral theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review