The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Co-Creation Paradigm
Abstract
Building on a decade-long pursuit to define and implement co-creative practices in business, The Co-Creation Paradigm calls for a radical rethinking of traditional ideas about how value is created. Aruging that organizations must engage their stakeholders as drivers of the process, this book illustrates how to create "win more—win more" outcomes in the private, public, and social sector.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Due to the nature of OHCs that provides access to information and coordinated social interaction, they constitute an alternative solution for patients’ needs, such that they likely improve the well-being of individuals and society as a whole [86].”
From Improving the Theoretical Understanding Toward Patient-Driven Health Care Innovation Through Online Value Cocreation: Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3 · Cited by 4,208
GREENHALGH, T., JACKSON, C., SHAW, S., & JANAMIAN, T. (2016) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12197 · Cited by 1,288
What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027 · Cited by 735
Self-citationIndustry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review
Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., & Gatti, C. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103821 · Cited by 564
Managing Co-creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation
Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12087 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K.
- ORCID
- Ozcan, Kerimcan
- Venue
- Stanford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2900284547
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 32.18
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Keywords
- co-creation, value creation, stakeholder engagement, organizational practices, organizational change, public sector, third sector, win-win outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
