Cited by 20Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis

Mixing studies for lupus anticoagulant: mostly yes, sometimes no

Open access
Favaloro, Emmanuel·2020·Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Abstract

Lupus anticoagulants (LAs) represent one manifestation of the clinical condition called antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and are associated with many adverse clinical outcomes, but primarily with thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. LAs are identified by laboratory testing, principally using clot-based assays based on Russell viper venom time (RVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) test methods. All three of the most recent guidance documents for LA testing recommend using these tests, although they vary in regard to inclusion/exclusion of other test processes. Mixing studies form part of the process of LA identification/exclusion, since in vitro LAs act like coagulation inhibitors. Mixing studies are also supported by all three LA guidance documents, but recommendations vary in regard to relative importance and placement in the LA identification/exclusion algorithm. This Point article takes the position that mixing tests are usually indicated for appropriate identification/exclusion of LAs, but can occasionally be omitted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm-2019-1240

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Favaloro, E.
Affiliations
Westmead Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Favaloro, Emmanuel
Venue
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2019-12-24
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
487-491
ISSN
  • 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4331
OpenAlex
W2998426955
Cited by
20
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, mixing studies, antiphospholipid syndrome, activated partial thromboplastin time, anticoagulants, thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity
MeSH terms
Anticoagulants, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Prothrombin Time, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review