Cited by 53Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchHemophilia Treatment and Research

Coagulation mixing studies: utility, algorithmic strategies and limitations for lupus anticoagulant testing or follow up of abnormal coagulation tests

Open access
Favaloro, Emmanuel J.·2020·American Journal of Hematology

Abstract

Coagulation testing underpins the investigation of hemostasis and/or monitoring of anticoagulation therapy for prevention and/or treatment of thrombosis related pathology. Assessment of coagulation results requires comparison against a normal reference range or interval (NRR/NRI). Results flagged as "abnormal" (ie, above the NRR/NRI for patients not on anticoagulant therapy), typically require further evaluation. eg, follow up or reflexive testing is used to identify the reason for prolongation, especially when supported by clinical context (eg, bleeding). Mixing tests may have utility to help identify the pathway of follow-up testing (ie, towards investigation of factor deficiencies, or else inhibitors), and are also useful for investigation of lupus anticoagulants (LA). In general, mixing tests that "correct" tend to suggest the presence of factor deficiencies, where as those that do not correct suggest the presence of "inhibitors". Various approaches can be used to identify correction/non-correction, and all have strengths and limitations. Furthermore, eventual identification of causal factor deficiencies or even "inhibitors" may (eg, factor VIII or IX deficiencies or inhibitors) or may not (eg, factor XII deficiency) be clinically important. Ultimately, mixing studies performed in view of appropriate clinical scenarios (eg, bleeding patient) and for LA investigations in symptomatic patients will have best utility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajh.25669

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Favaloro EJ, Bonar R, Duncan E, et al. Identification of factor inhibi- tors by diagnostic haemostasis laboratories: a large multi-centre eval- uation. Thromb Haemost. 2006;96:73-78.
  2. Ledford-Kraemer M. All mixed up about mixing studies. The Clotting Times. 2004;3:2-6.
  3. Favaloro EJ, Wong RCW. Antiphospholipid antibody testing for the antiphospholipid syndrome: a synopsis of challenges and recent guidelines. Pathology. 2014;46:481-495.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Favaloro, E. J.
Affiliations
Westmead Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Favaloro, Emmanuel J.
Venue
American Journal of Hematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-20
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
117-128
ISSN
  • 0361-8609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8652
OpenAlex
W2987416135
Cited by
53
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, anticoagulants, factor deficiency, hemophilia A, hemophilia B, factor XII deficiency, hemorrhage, anticoagulation monitoring, thrombosis
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Blood Coagulation Disorders, Blood Coagulation Tests, Hemostasis, Humans, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review