Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural Underpinnings of Temporal Processing: Α Review of Focal Lesion, Pharmacological, and Functional Imaging Research

Open access
Harrington, Deborah L., Haaland, Kathleen Y.·1999·Reviews in the Neurosciences

Abstract

The mechanisms by which the brain times events and stores them in memory for later use is increasingly of interest to neuroscientists. There are a variety of neurological disorders in which skilled behaviors are not coordinated and appear less than fluent, which may suggest a disorder in temporal processing. In this review, two influential models are described which suggest timing deficits may be due to impairments in a timekeeping mechanism or various nontemporal processes such as motor implementation, memory, and attention. We then review focal lesion, pharmacological, and functional imaging approaches to understanding the neural underpinnings of temporal processing. Converging findings from these approaches provide support for the role of the basal ganglia in timekeeping operations. Likewise, focal lesion and some functional imaging studies are compatible with a timekeeping role of the cerebellum, though specific regions within the cerebellum that control timing operations have not been identified. In contrast, the results from recent focal lesion research suggests the right middle-frontal and inferior-parietal cortices comprise a pathway that supports attention and working memory operations, which are crucial for timing. Functional imaging data provide some converging evidence for this proposal. Functional imaging work also indicates that a right superior-temporal inferior-frontal pathway sometimes aids timing through subvocal nonlinguistic rehearsal processes. These distributed pathways maintain timekeeping operations in working memory and store representations of temporal events, which is crucial for skilled performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/revneuro.1999.10.2.91

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Harrington, D. L., & Haaland, K. Y.
Venue
Reviews in the Neurosciences
Published
1999-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
91-116
ISSN
  • 0334-1763 (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0200
OpenAlex
W2277257081
Cited by
196
References
7
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Underpinnings of Temporal Processing: Α Review of Focal Lesion, Pharmacological, and Functional Imaging Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/revneuro.1999.10.2.91
The paper
Harrington, D. L., & Haaland, K. Y. (1999). Neural Underpinnings of Temporal Processing: Α Review of Focal Lesion, Pharmacological, and Functional Imaging Research. Reviews in the Neurosciences. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro.1999.10.2.91

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.