Cited by 541Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Impulsivity, time perception, emotion and reinforcement sensitivity in patients with orbitofrontal cortex lesions

Berlin, H. A.·2004·Brain

Abstract

Damage to the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in humans has been associated with disinhibited or socially inappropriate behaviour and emotional changes. Some of the changes may be related to difficulty in responding correctly to rewards and punishers, in that these patients have difficulty in learning to correct their choice of a visual stimulus when it is no longer associated with reward. We extend this fundamental approach by investigating the relationship between frontal dysfunction and impulsive behaviour, the behavioural, emotional and personality changes seen in patients with prefrontal cortex damage, and thus in addition illuminate the cognitive and biological processes that are impaired in impulsive people. OFC patients (n = 23) performed more impulsively on both self-report and cognitive/behavioural tests of impulsivity, reported more inappropriate 'frontal' behaviours, and performed worse on a stimulus-reinforcement association reversal task, than non-OFC prefrontal cortex lesion control (n = 20) and normal control (n = 39) participants. Further, OFC patients experienced more subjective anger than non-OFC and normal participants, and less subjective happiness than normals; and had a faster subjective sense of time (overestimated and underproduced time intervals) than normal controls, while non-OFC patients did not differ from normals. Finally, both OFC and non-OFC patients were less open to experience than normal participants. There were no differences between OFC patients, non-OFC lesion patients and normal controls on all other personality traits, most notably extraversion. In a spatial working memory task, the non-OFC group, most of whom had dorsolateral prefrontal cortex lesions, were impaired in that they repeatedly returned to previously chosen empty locations ('within errors'), whereas OFC patients were not impaired on this measure. Thus there is a dissociation between the effects of OFC damage which does not affect this measure of spatial working memory but does affect impulsive and inappropriate behaviour, reversal, personality, time perception and emotion; and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex damage which does affect this measure of spatial working memory, but not impulsive and inappropriate behaviour, reversal, personality, time perception and emotion. The effects of OFC damage on impulsive and related behaviours described here have implications for understanding impulsive behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awh135

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Orbitofrontal cortex lesions produce impulsive or perseverative behaviors.

    “Other consequences of OFC lesions include impulsive or perserverative behaviors (Bechara et al., 1994; Berlin et al., 2004; Rolls et al., 1994).”

    From Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction (2009) · cites this paper as Berlin et al., 2004

  • Damage to human orbitofrontal cortex, but not ventromedial frontal lobe, increases tendency to choose immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards.

    “damage to the human OFC (Berlin et al., 2004), but not the ventromedial frontal lobe (Fellows and Farah, 2005), increases the tendency to choose immediate rewards over larger, delayed rewards.”

    From Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction (2009) · cites this paper as Berlin et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berlin, H. A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Berlin, H. A.
Venue
Brain
Published
2004-02-26
Volume
127
Issue
5
Pages
1108-1126
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2070140174
Cited by
541
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 26
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
impulsivity, time perception, emotions, reinforcement sensitivity, anger, subjective happiness, personality traits, openness to experience, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, spatial working memory, inappropriate behavior, frontal lobe dysfunction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Emotions, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Psychological Tests, Reinforcement, Psychology, Time Perception, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review