Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MicroRNAs and ceRNAs: therapeutic implications of RNA networks

Giza, Dana Elena, Vasilescu, Catalin, Calin, George A·2014·Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

Abstract

Introduction A new concept of gene regulation, in which competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) compete for common microRNAs (miRNAs), suggests that mRNA targets have an active role as key elements in the regulation of miRNA availability within cells. ceRNAs are considered to be natural decoys of miRNA activity and can influence the expression of multiple miRNAs. Areas covered A new complex network of indirect interaction among the RNA transcripts competing for the same pool of miRNAs has been described; in this network, the nodes are the targets, and the links between the nodes are the miRNAs the targets have in common, which form smaller subnetworks. The incidence, state and severity of cancer can be evaluated on the basis of this network signature. The study of these new genome-scale regulatory networks involving miRNAs and ceRNAs may provide information that researchers can use to fine-tune these networks to improve responses to cancer therapy and/or develop new therapeutic interventions. Expert opinion Combinational approaches based on complex regulatory ceRNA networks (ceRNETs) may be one of the most promising strategies for silencing important mediators of cancer-promoting pathways. Targeting a single miRNA may in fact represent a combined intervention that acts on the feedback and compensatory pathways that can impair treatment response or cause treatment resistance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14712598.2014.920812

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1126/science.1155472 · DOI
  2. 10.1142/S0219720009004126 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-1-61779-427-8_15 · DOI
  4. 10.1101/gr.098046.109 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.040 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nrc2619 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4607 · DOI
  9. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0202 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/wrna.1213 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nmeth1079 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.014 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066609 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.041 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.012 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.052 · DOI
  17. 10.1517/14712598.2012.693470 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0159 · DOI
  19. 10.1517/14728222.9.6.1179 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/scisignal.2004177 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1222509110 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.032 · DOI
  23. Su X, 2013, Chin J Cancer Res, 25, 235
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Seo H, 2013, Int J Oncol, 43, 1737, 10.3892/ijo.2013.2114 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.1305322110 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/bies.200800212 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nrd4140 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/nar/gkq285 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0306-9877(02)00383-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Giza, D. E., Vasilescu, C., & Calin, G. A.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Published
2014-06-18
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
1285-1293
ISSN
  • 1471-2598
  • 1744-7682
Cited by
51
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review