Cited by 761Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes — An Interim Analysis

Open access
Home, Philip D., Pocock, Stuart J., Beck-Nielsen, Henning, Gomis, Ramón, Hanefeld, Markolf, Jones, Nigel P., Komajda, Michel, McMurray, John J.V.·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent meta-analysis raised concern regarding an increased risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes associated with rosiglitazone treatment of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted an unplanned interim analysis of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial involving 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control while receiving metformin or sulfonylurea, in which 2220 patients were assigned to receive add-on rosiglitazone (rosiglitazone group), and 2227 to receive a combination of metformin plus sulfonylurea (control group). The primary end point was hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes. RESULTS: Because the mean follow-up was only 3.75 years, our interim analysis had limited statistical power to detect treatment differences. A total of 217 patients in the rosiglitazone group and 202 patients in the control group had the adjudicated primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.31). After the inclusion of end points pending adjudication, the hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.32). There were no statistically significant differences between the rosiglitazone group and the control group regarding myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes or any cause. There were more patients with heart failure in the rosiglitazone group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.57). CONCLUSIONS: Our interim findings from this ongoing study were inconclusive regarding the effect of rosiglitazone on the overall risk of hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes. There was no evidence of any increase in death from either cardiovascular causes or all causes. Rosiglitazone was associated with an increased risk of heart failure. The data were insufficient to determine whether the drug was associated with an increase in the risk of myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00379769 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa073394

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:685-96.
  2. The New England Journal of Medicine . For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. n engl j med 357;

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Home, P. D., Pocock, S. J., Beck-Nielsen, H., Gomis, R., Hanefeld, M., Jones, N. P., Komajda, M., & McMurray, J. J. V.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-07-05
Volume
357
Issue
1
Pages
28-38
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1972136146
Cited by
761
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 29
FWCI
122.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Newcastle University
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Servier
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Keywords
rosiglitazone, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular outcomes, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, metformin, sulfonylureas, adjunctive therapy, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Rosiglitazone, Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Thiazolidinediones, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review