CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Interval Exercise Differing in Interval Duration

Tucker, Wesley J., Sawyer, Brandon J., Jarrett, Catherine L., Bhammar, Dharini M., Gaesser, Glenn A.·2015·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We determined the oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2), heart rate (HR), and blood lactate responses to 2 high-intensity interval exercise protocols differing in interval length. On separate days, 14 recreationally active males performed a 4 × 4 (four 4-minute intervals at 90-95% HRpeak, separated by 3-minute recovery at 50 W) and 16 × 1 (sixteen 1-minute intervals at 90-95% HRpeak, separated by 1-minute recovery at 50 W) protocol on a cycle ergometer. The 4 × 4 elicited a higher mean V[Combining Dot Above]O2 (2.44 ± 0.4 vs. 2.36 ± 0.4 L·min) and "peak" V[Combining Dot Above]O2 (90-99% vs. 76-85% V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak) and HR (95-98% HRpeak vs. 81-95% HRpeak) during the high-intensity intervals. Average power maintained was higher for the 16 × 1 (241 ± 45 vs. 204 ± 37 W), and recovery interval V[Combining Dot Above]O2 and HR were higher during the 16 × 1. No differences were observed for blood lactate concentrations at the midpoint (12.1 ± 2.2 vs. 10.8 ± 3.1 mmol·L) and end (10.6 ± 1.5 vs. 10.6 ± 2.4 mmol·L) of the protocols or ratings of perceived exertion (7.0 ± 1.6 vs. 7.0 ± 1.4) and Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale scores (91 ± 15 vs. 93 ± 12). Despite a 4-fold difference in interval duration that produced greater between-interval transitions in V[Combining Dot Above]O2 and HR and slightly higher mean V[Combining Dot Above]O2 during the 4 × 4, mean HR during each protocol was the same, and both protocols were rated similarly for perceived exertion and enjoyment. The major difference was that power output had to be reduced during the 4 × 4 protocol to maintain the desired HR.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001000

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from recent studies showed similar enjoyment between two regimes of HIIT and similar affect between HIIT and SIT.

    “Despite significant physiological differences between these modes of interval training, findings from recent studies showed similar enjoyment between two regimes of HIIT [18] and similar affect between HIIT and SIT [19].”

    From High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise (2017) · cites this paper as [18]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Oliveira, 2013, Continuous and high-intensity interval training: Which promotes higher pleasure PLoS O, ne, 8, e79965

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Tucker, W. J., Sawyer, B. J., Jarrett, C. L., Bhammar, D. M., & Gaesser, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine (US)
  • Point Loma Nazarene University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gaesser, Glenn A.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2015-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
3326-3335
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1519/jsc.0000000000001000
OpenAlex
W310596408
Cited by
62
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4
FWCI
15.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Arizona State University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
high-intensity interval training, interval length, oxygen consumption, heart rate, blood lactate, output power, recovery interval, perceived exertion, exercise enjoyment, cycle ergometer, peak oxygen uptake
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Exercise Test, Physical Exertion, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Lactic Acid, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review