CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 97Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissimilar Physiological and Perceptual Responses Between Sprint Interval Training and High-Intensity Interval Training

Wood, Kimberly M., Olive, Brittany, LaValle, Kaylyn, Thompson, Heather, Greer, Kevin, Astorino, Todd A.·2016·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001042
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Wood, KM, Olive, B, LaValle, K, Thompson, H, Greer, K, and Astorino, TA. Dissimilar physiological and perceptual responses between sprint interval training and high-intensity interval training. J Strength Cond Res 30(1): 244–250, 2016—High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and sprint interval training (SIT) elicit similar cardiovascular and metabolic adaptations vs. endurance training. No study, however, has investigated acute physiological changes during HIIT vs. SIT. This study compared acute changes in heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (BLa), oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2), affect, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during HIIT and SIT. Active adults (4 women and 8 men, age = 24.2 ± 6.2 years) initially performed a V[Combining Dot Above]O2max test to determine workload for both sessions on the cycle ergometer, whose order was randomized. Sprint interval training consisted of 8 bouts of 30 seconds of all-out cycling at 130% of maximum Watts (Wmax). High-intensity interval training consisted of eight 60-second bouts at 85% Wmax. Heart rate, V[Combining Dot Above]O2, BLa, affect, and RPE were continuously assessed throughout exercise. Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant difference between HIIT and SIT for V[Combining Dot Above]O2 (p < 0.001), HR (p < 0.001), RPE (p = 0.03), and BLa (p = 0.049). Conversely, there was no significant difference between regimens for affect (p = 0.12). Energy expenditure was significantly higher (p = 0.02) in HIIT (209.3 ± 40.3 kcal) vs. SIT (193.5 ± 39.6 kcal). During HIIT, subjects burned significantly more calories and reported lower perceived exertion than SIT. The higher V[Combining Dot Above]O2 and lower BLa in HIIT vs. SIT reflected dissimilar metabolic perturbation between regimens, which may elicit unique long-term adaptations. If an individual is seeking to burn slightly more calories, maintain a higher oxygen uptake, and perceive less exertion during exercise, HIIT is the recommended routine.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001042

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from recent studies showed similar enjoyment between two regimes of HIIT and similar affect between HIIT and SIT.

    “Despite significant physiological differences between these modes of interval training, findings from recent studies showed similar enjoyment between two regimes of HIIT [18] and similar affect between HIIT and SIT [19].”

    From High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise (2017) · cites this paper as [19]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Oliveira, 2013, Continuous and high-intensity interval training: Which promotes higher pleasure PLoS O, ne, 8, e79965

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Wood, K. M., Olive, B., LaValle, K., Thompson, H., Greer, K., & Astorino, T. A.
Affiliations
California State University, San Marcos (US)
Corresponding author
Astorino, Todd A.
ORCID
Astorino, Todd A.
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2016-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
244-250
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1519/jsc.0000000000001042
OpenAlex
W2297240455
Cited by
96
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
17.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
sprint interval training, high-intensity interval training, acute physiological responses, rating of perceived exertion, blood lactate, oxygen consumption, heart rate, affect, energy expenditure, all-out cycling, exercise intensity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Test, Physical Exertion, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Perception, Running, Biomarkers, Lactic Acid, Physical Conditioning, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review