Cited by 45Gender Roles and Identity StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Effects of Gender, Diagnostic Labels, and Causal Theories on Willingness to Report Symptoms of Depression

Berger, Joshua L., Addis, Michael E., Reilly, Erin D., Syzdek, Matthew R., Green, Jonathan D.·2012·Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Previous research has investigated whether lower rates of diagnosed depression in men may be due in part to sex differences in how men and women respond to the various contextual cues associated with self-report measures of depression (Sigmon et al., 2005). In the current study, a community sample completed an online CES-D self-report measure, and we manipulated both the causal theory of depression (controllable or uncontrollable) and the type of label (stress or depression) presented along with the measure. The effect of these factors on willingness to self-report was evaluated according to sex (n = 445) and gender (n = 443) in two separate 2 × 2 × 2 cross-sectional designs. Results indicate that men were less likely to self-report when the term depression was used in conjunction with an uncontrollable causal theory attributing symptoms to factors outside one's personal control (e.g., biology or environmental events). This effect may contribute to the documented sex difference in diagnosed rates of depression, and is important for healthcare workers to consider when screening men for depression in clinical settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/jscp.2012.31.5.439

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, J. L., Addis, M. E., Reilly, E. D., Syzdek, M. R., & Green, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Clark University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
Published
2012-05
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
439-457
ISSN
0736-7236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991700108
Cited by
45
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, sex differences, gender differences, self-report, diagnostic labels, controllability, stress, depression screening, CES-D

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review