Cited by 292Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyChild Abuse and Trauma

Retrospective Reporting of Childhood Adversity: Issues in Assessing Long-Term Recall

Maughan, Barbara, Rutter, Michael·1997·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

Much evidence for associations between adverse experiences in childhood and personality disorder in adult life comes from retrospective accounts. This raises important questions over the reliability and validity of long-term recall. The strengths and limitations of different methods for assessing the accuracy and stability of retrospective reports are discussed. Evidence from cognitive psychology on memory and memory processes, and on the phenomenon of infantile amnesia, provides important background for assessing issues more specific to recall in studies of risk for psychopathology. Here, topics of particular concern include: memory for traumatic early experience; the effects of mood state and symptomatology on recall; recovered or false memories; and the implications of mental representations of early experience for understanding psychopathology. Current evidence suggests that while adequately reliable accounts of many early experiences can be gained using appropriate techniques, further methodological studies are needed, and investigations using retrospective methods would be wise to include corroborative evidence whenever feasible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.1.19

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents may have a heightened awareness and immediate recall of recent experiences of abuse.

    “First, adolescents may have a heightened awareness and immediate recall of recent experiences of abuse. Given their proximity to these events, they might perceive and report abuse more acutely compared to adults, who might have more time-distanced and less vivid memories of their childhood experiences (38, 39).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maughan, B., & Rutter, M.
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
1997-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
19-33
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113427371
Cited by
292
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
childhood adversity, retrospective recall, long-term memory, memory reliability, infantile amnesia, traumatic memory, false memory, recovered memory, personality disorders, psychopathology risk, corroborative evidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Psychology, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Memory, Personality Disorders, Mental Recall, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review