Cited by 139Child Abuse and TraumaPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMemory Processes and Influences

Structural equation modeling of repeated retrospective reports of childhood maltreatment: Modeling of reports of child maltreatment

Open access
Fergusson, David M., Horwood, L. John, Boden, Joseph M.·2011·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

The present study examined errors of reporting, including unreliability and recall bias, in retrospective reports of childhood maltreatment. Data were gathered on retrospective reports of childhood sexual and physical abuse and current mental health in a birth cohort of over 980 participants studied at ages 18 and 21. A structural equation model was developed to estimate the contributions of test unreliability and recall bias to reporting variation. Retrospective abuse reports were of modest test-retest reliability (r(tt) = 0.50 approximately). Recall bias accounted for <1% of report variance. As a consequence the observed correlations between maltreatment and mental health closely approximated the corresponding estimated true correlations. The results of the study suggested that, for this cohort, errors of measurement in reports of childhood maltreatment did not pose a significant threat to study validity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.337

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Klein M.W. (ed.) Cross-national Research in Self-reported Crime and Delinquency, pp. 155-186, Boston, MA, Kluwer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Boden, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-15
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
93-104
ISSN
1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106658365
Cited by
139
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
  • National Child Health Research Foundation
  • Canterbury Medical Research Foundation
  • New Zealand Lottery Grants Board
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
child abuse, retrospective reports, recall bias, test-retest reliability, measurement error, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, mental health, birth cohort
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Models, Theoretical, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Bias, Sample Size, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review