Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NeuroEVs: Characterizing Extracellular Vesicles Generated in the Neural Domain

Fowler, Christie D.·2019·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Intercellular communication has recently been shown to occur via transfer of cargo loaded within extracellular vesicles (EVs). Present within all biofluids of the body, EVs can contain various signaling factors, including coding and noncoding RNAs (e.g., mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, snRNA, tRNA, yRNA), DNA, proteins, and enzymes. Multiple types of cells appear to be capable of releasing EVs, including cancer, stem, epithelial, immune, glial, and neuronal cells. However, the functional impact of these circulating signals among neural networks within the brain has been difficult to establish given the complexity of cellular populations involved in release and uptake, as well as inherent limitations of examining a biofluid. In this brief commentary, we provide an analysis of the conceptual and technical considerations that limit our current understanding of signaling mediated by circulating EVs relative to their impact on neural function. Dual Perspectives Companion Paper:Extracellular Vesicles and Neurodegenerative Diseases, by Andrew F. Hill

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0146-18.2019

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078115 · DOI
  2. 10.3233/CBM-160609 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/ncb1725 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nbt.1807 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.3390/pharmaceutics10040218 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/emboj.2011.489 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1128/JVI.00088-18 · DOI
  8. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.7268 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/emboj.2009.45 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094839 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/jmcb/mjt011 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1408301111 · DOI
  13. 10.3402/jev.v3.24722 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00204 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/BF00341434 · DOI
  16. 10.4049/jimmunol.165.3.1259 · DOI
  17. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0510 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001604 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1186/s13024-016-0108-1 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/20013078.2017.1422676 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/20013078.2017.1347019 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nature15756 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.013 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1080/20013078.2017.1422674 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.conb.2016.04.016 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.11.004 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/bies.201100076 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.109 · DOI
  29. 10.3402/jev.v3.26913 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1080/20013078.2017.1286095 · DOI
  31. 10.1083/jcb.2.4.467 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/ncb3015 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.12.006 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/srep32651 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.02.011 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.mam.2017.11.012 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.024 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90631-X · DOI
  39. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00534 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/ncb1800 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1080/20013078.2017.1388731 · DOI
  42. 10.1083/jcb.147.3.599 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/ncb1596 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1080/20013078.2017.1348885 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/20013078.2017.1344087 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/srep31175 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.064 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.152 · DOI
  50. 10.1182/blood-2004-05-2042 · DOI
  51. 10.3402/jev.v4.29260 · DOI
  52. 10.3389/fnins.2017.00229 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/20013078.2017.1329476 · DOI
  54. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00824 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/nm0598-594 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Fowler, C. D.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2019-11-20
Volume
39
Issue
47
Pages
9262-9268
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
35
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review