Cited by 141

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial Memory Formation and Memory-Enhancing Effect of Glucose Involves Activation of the Tuberous Sclerosis Complex–Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway

Dash, Pramod K., Orsi, Sara A., Moore, Anthony N.·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The tuberous sclerosis complex–mammalian target of rapamycin (TSC–mTOR) cascade integrates growth factor and nutritional signals to regulate the synthesis of specific proteins. Because both growth factor signaling and glucose have been implicated in memory formation, we questioned whether mTOR activity is required for long-term spatial memory formation and whether this cascade is involved in the memory-augmenting effect of centrally applied glucose. To test our hypothesis, we directly administered rapamycin (an inhibitor of mTOR), glucose, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1β-4-ribonucleoside (AICAR; an activator of AMP kinase), or glucose plus rapamycin into the dorsal hippocampus after we trained rats in the Morris water maze task. The results from these studies indicate that glucose enhances, whereas AICAR and rapamycin both impair, long-term spatial memory. Furthermore, the memory-impairing effect of targeted rapamycin administration could not be overcome by coadministration of glucose. Consistent with these behavioral results, biochemical analysis revealed that glucose and AICAR had opposing influences on the activation of the TSC–mTOR cascade, as indicated by the phosphorylation of ribosomal S6 kinase (S6K) and 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1), targets of mTOR. Together, these findings suggest that memory formation requires the mTOR cascade and that the memory-enhancing effect of glucose involves its ability to activate this pathway.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0671-06.2006

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1007/BF02244373 · DOI
  2. 10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002145 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/45287 · DOI
  4. (1998), J Neurosci, 18, 10037, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10037.1998 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/lm.74104 · DOI
  6. (1999), J Neurosci, 19, 3535, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-09-03535.1999 · DOI
  7. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.047019 · DOI
  8. 10.1101/lm.88205 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81653-0 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20498.x · DOI
  11. 10.1002/hipo.20078 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/jnr.20174 · DOI
  13. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.275 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/ncb847 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0163-1047(86)80022-X · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.82.13.4549 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2693 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.96.26.14866 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.1715094 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/ncb839 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00929-2 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/ng1494 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/MMBR.69.1.79-100.2005 · DOI
  24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2270-05.2005 · DOI
  25. Jefferies HB, Fumagalli S, Dennis PB, Reinhard C, Pearson RB, Thomas G (1997) Rapamycin suppresses 5′-TOP mRNA translation through inhibition of p70s6k. EMBO J 3693–3704. · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1006/nlme.1996.0020 · DOI
  27. (2002), Ann NY Acad Sci, 959, 167, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02091.x · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.nlm.2004.10.004 · DOI
  29. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2284-05.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1210/en.2004-0968 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0306-4522(97)00630-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.11.007 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.031 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80484-5 · DOI
  35. 10.2337/diabetes.53.8.1953 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.050583697 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/0166-4328(88)90022-8 · DOI
  38. 10.1074/jbc.M405173200 · DOI
  39. 10.1073/pnas.0506925102 · DOI
  40. 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7416 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/08830738040190090601 · DOI
  42. (1994), J Neurosci, 14, 7478, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-12-07478.1994 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.93.10.4693 · DOI
  44. (1998), J Neurosci, 18, 1595, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-04-01595.1998 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00242-X · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00500-0 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00190-4 · DOI · Paper page
  48. (2000), J Neurosci, 20, 8177, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-08177.2000 · DOI
  49. (1985), Exp Brain Res, 58, 11
  50. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02578.x · DOI
  51. (2000), Cancer Res, 60, 3504
  52. 10.1016/S0955-0674(98)80150-6 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01006-4 · DOI
  54. 10.1073/pnas.012605299 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1074/jbc.M303257200 · DOI
  56. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.327 · DOI
  57. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02820.x · DOI
  58. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03538.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. (2004), Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 279, 271

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 141

Metadata

Authors
Dash, P. K., Orsi, S. A., & Moore, A. N.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-08-02
Volume
26
Issue
31
Pages
8048-8056
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
141
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review