Cited by 784Multisensory perception and integrationVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Touching a Rubber Hand: Feeling of Body Ownership Is Associated with Activity in Multisensory Brain Areas

Open access

Abstract

In the "rubber-hand illusion," the sight of brushing of a rubber hand at the same time as brushing of the person's own hidden hand is sufficient to produce a feeling of ownership of the fake hand. We shown previously that this illusion is associated with activity in the multisensory areas, most notably the ventral premotor cortex (Ehrsson et al., 2004). However, it remains to be demonstrated that this illusion does not simply reflect the dominant role of vision and that the premotor activity does not reflect a visual representation of an object near the hand. To address these issues, we introduce a somatic rubber-hand illusion. The experimenter moved the blindfolded participant's left index finger so that it touched the fake hand, and simultaneously, he touched the participant's real right hand, synchronizing the touches as perfectly as possible. After approximately 9.7 s, this stimulation elicited an illusion that one was touching one's own hand. We scanned brain activity during this illusion and two control conditions, using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Activity in the ventral premotor cortices, intraparietal cortices, and the cerebellum was associated with the illusion of touching one's own hand. Furthermore, the rated strength of the illusion correlated with the degree of premotor and cerebellar activity. This finding suggests that the activity in these areas reflects the detection of congruent multisensory signals from one's own body, rather than of visual representations. We propose that this could be the mechanism for the feeling of body ownership.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0800-05.2005

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1037//0012-1649.21.6.963 · DOI
  2. 2005, Cereb Cortex, 7, 913
  3. 1983, Exp Brain Res, 50, 464
  4. 1984, Exp Brain Res, 56, 410
  5. 2001, Common mechanisms in perception and action, attention and performance, XIX, 136
  6. 1997, Ann NY Acad Sci, 818, 38
  7. 1937, L'Encephale, 32, 57
  8. 1993, Magn Reson Q, 9, 259

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 784

Metadata

Authors
Ehrsson, H. H., Holmes, N. P., & Passingham, R. E.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-11-09
Volume
25
Issue
45
Pages
10564-10573
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2095398263
Cited by
784
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 43
FWCI
19.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (065696)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
rubber hand illusion, body ownership, multisensory integration, ventral premotor cortex, intraparietal cortex, cerebellum, tactile perception, illusion strength
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Hand, Humans, Illusions, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Oxygen, Physical Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Psychophysics, Touch, Visual Perception, Linear Models, Human Body

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review