Cited by 277Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Response variability of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) of alert monkeys

Open access
Gur, Moshe, Beylin, Alexander, Snodderly, D. Max·1997·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Response variability of neurons limits the reliability and resolution of sensory systems. It is generally thought that response variability in the visual system increases at cortical levels, but the causes of the variability have not been identified. We have measured the response variability of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) of alert monkeys. We recorded from 80 single cells distributed over all V1 layers and from 8 parvocellular cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus. All cells were stimulated with a bar of near-optimal orientation, color, and dimensions while continuously monitoring the eye movements of fixation. To minimize the effects of eye movements, responses that occurred while the eye was relatively steady were selected for analysis. The impulses elicited by each stimulus presentation were counted, and the variance and coefficient of variation were computed. Both measures of response variability were much lower than reported previously for V1 cells of both alert and anesthetized monkeys. Our data show that fixational eye movements cause a large component of response variance in alert monkeys. Moreover, the reliability of V1 neurons is not obviously degraded compared with lateral geniculate nucleus cells. The high reliability of neurons in alert monkeys is consistent with expectations from conventional biophysical models, and it suggests that activity in a modest number of neurons may suffice to form a perceptual decision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.17-08-02914.1997

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-sensory factors such as behavioral state, motor activity, and cross-modal influences affect sensory processing and may together increase response variability.

    “Many non-sensory factors affect sensory processing, including behavioral state, motor activity and cross-modal influences (Gur et al., 1997), and their effects may collectively promote response variability (Ecker and Tolias, 2014; Goris et al., 2014; I-Chun et al., 2015).”

    From Waking state: rapid variations modulate neural and behavioral responses (2015) · cites this paper as Gur et al., 1997

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gur, M., Beylin, A., & Snodderly, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1997-04-15
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
2914-2920
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1885232817
Cited by
277
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
response variability, primary visual cortex, fixational eye movements, coefficient of variation, lateral geniculate nucleus, single-unit recording, perceptual decision making
MeSH terms
Animals, Color Perception, Eye Movements, Female, Geniculate Bodies, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta, Neurons, Regression Analysis, Space Perception, Vision, Ocular, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review