Cited by 270Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Neural Systems Underlying Opiate Addiction

Open access
De Vries, Taco J., Shippenberg, Toni S.·2002·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Opiate addiction is a chronically relapsing disorder that is characterized by compulsive drug taking, an inability to limit intake, and bouts of intense drug craving that can be precipitated by the mere presence of people, places, or objects previously associated with drug use. Although knowledge of

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.22-09-03321.2002

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Opioids produce their analgesic and dependency-forming effects through agonism of opioid receptors, most importantly the MOR, with downstream effect on GABAergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission.

    “Opioids produce their analgesic and dependency-forming effects through agonism of opioid receptors, and, most importantly, the MOR, with downstream effect on GABAergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission.2,19,20”

    From Tapering and withdrawing opioids: guidance informed by fundamental principles to minimise withdrawal symptoms (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The “Systems involved in opiate self-administration” section says opiates bind opioid receptors, identifies MOR as critical to heroin and morphine reward, and describes MOR agonists affecting GABA neurons and dopamine release. It does not explain analgesia through that GABA–dopamine pathway; analgesia appears only in the title of a cited study in the References. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At the cellular level tolerance occurs because of the drive to homeostatic balance, involving de-sensitisation and down-regulation of MORs, as well as modifications to the mu-signalosome, neuronal proteome, transcriptome and neuronal morphology, with consequent downstream effects on mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons.

    “At the cellular level tolerance occurs because of the drive to homeostatic balance, 2 involving de-sensitisation and down-regulation of MORs, as well as modifications to the mu-signalosome, neuronal proteome, transcriptome and neuronal morphology, 20 with consequent downstream effects on mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons.19,20”

    From Tapering and withdrawing opioids: guidance informed by fundamental principles to minimise withdrawal symptoms (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ability of MOR antagonists to induce withdrawal symptoms in individuals with physiological opioid dependence supports the concept that withdrawal occurs because the raised homeostatic set-point registers reduced doses as under activation.

    “This concept is supported by the ability of MOR antagonists to induce withdrawal symptoms in individuals with physiological opioid dependence. 19”

    From Tapering and withdrawing opioids: guidance informed by fundamental principles to minimise withdrawal symptoms (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    In “Neuroadaptations resulting from chronic opiate use” (page unavailable), the paper says opioid receptor antagonists produce withdrawal signs in morphine-dependent animals and attributes those effects to MOR antagonism. It does not establish the effect in human individuals or describe withdrawal in terms of a raised homeostatic set-point; the latter is the citing authors’ interpretation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Vries, T. J., & Shippenberg, T. S.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
3321-3325
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2096140192
Cited by
270
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
opioid use disorder, neural systems, relapse, compulsive drug taking, drug craving, drug cues, opioid reward
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Humans, Motivation, Opioid-Related Disorders, Narcotics, Nervous System, Neuropeptides, Recurrence, Stress, Physiological, Neurotransmitter Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review