Cited by 418Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects

Disruption of the κ‐opioid receptor gene in mice enhances sensitivity to chemical visceral pain, impairs pharmacological actions of the selective κ‐agonist U‐50,488H and attenuates morphine withdrawal

Open access
Simonin, Frédéric, Valverde, Olga, Smadja, Claire, Slowe, Susan, Kitchen, Ian, Dierich, Andrée, Le Meur, Marianne, Roques, Bernard P. +2 more·1998·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

***micro***-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors are widely expressed in the central nervous system where they mediate the strong analgesic and mood-altering actions of opioids, and modulate numerous endogenous functions. To investigate the contribution of the kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) to opioid function in vivo, we have generated KOR-deficient mice by gene targeting. We show that absence of KOR does not modify expression of the other components of the opioid system, and behavioural tests indicate that spontaneous activity is not altered in mutant mice. The analysis of responses to various nociceptive stimuli suggests that the KOR gene product is implicated in the perception of visceral chemical pain. We further demonstrate that KOR is critical to mediate the hypolocomotor, analgesic and aversive actions of the prototypic kappa-agonist U-50, 488H. Finally, our results indicate that this receptor does not contribute to morphine analgesia and reward, but participates in the expression of morphine abstinence. Together, our data demonstrate that the KOR-encoded receptor plays a modulatory role in specific aspects of opioid function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/emboj/17.4.886

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. De ´cimo,D., Labouesse,G. and Dolle ´,P. (1995) In situ hybridization of nucleic acid probes to cellular RNA. In Hames,B.D. and Higgins,S. (eds), Gene Probes 2: A Practical Approach . Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 183-210.
  2. Mansour,A. and Watson,S.J. (1993) Anatomical distribution of opioid receptors in mammalian: an overview. In Herz,A. (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Opioids I . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vol. 104/I, pp. 79-105.
  3. Zhu,Y., King,M., Schuller,A., Unterwald,E., Pasternak,G. and Pintar,J.E. (1997) Genetic disruption of the mouse delta opioid gene. In Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. Society for Neuroscience, Washington D.C. 20036, vol. 23, part 1, pp. 584.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simonin, F., Valverde, O., Smadja, C., Slowe, S., Kitchen, I., Dierich, A., Le Meur, M., Roques, B. P., Maldonado, R., & Kieffer, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Institut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire (FR)
Corresponding author
Kieffer, Brigitte L.
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
1998-02-15
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
886-897
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2165005697
Cited by
418
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche
  • Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
Keywords
kappa opioid receptor, gene targeting, nociception, U50,488H, morphine withdrawal, morphine analgesia, opioid reward, opioid system, aversive effects, locomotor activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Enkephalins, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Morphine, Pain, Pro-Opiomelanocortin, Protein Precursors, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Viscera, Receptors, Opioid, kappa, Mice, Knockout, 3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-Isomer, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review