Cited by 45Neural dynamics and brain functionMotor Control and AdaptationVestibular and auditory disorders

Correlated Discharge among Cell Pairs within the Oculomotor Horizontal Velocity-to-Position Integrator

Open access
Aksay, Emre, Baker, Robert, Seung, H. Sebastian, Tank, David W.·2003·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In the oculomotor system, temporal integration of velocity commands into position signals may depend on synaptic feedback among neurons of a bilateral brainstem cell assembly known as the “neural integrator.” Both ipsilateral excitatory and contralateral inhibitory projections between eye position-related integrator cells are hypothesized as a substrate for positive feedback supporting integration. Presence of feedback interactions should be evident in cross-correlation functions of neuron pairs. Here, unilateral and bilateral paired recordings were obtained during fixation behavior from neurons in goldfish brainstem area I, a key element of the integrator. During fixations, discharge of most unilateral pairs, composed of cells with eye position sensitivities of the same sign, was positively correlated with lag of 0-10 msec (n= 11 of 14 significant). Typically, a very narrow peak (mean half-width <4 msec) near zero lag was observed. Discharge of bilateral pairs, composed of cells with position sensitivities of the opposite sign, was either negatively correlated with lag of 0-10 msec (n= 5 of 13 significant) or not correlated. Troughs in negative correlations always had minima between 3 and 5 msec lag. These results are consistent with the feedback hypothesis of temporal integration, highlighting excitation unilaterally and inhibition bilaterally. Absence of visual input did not weaken correlations, but other sources of correlated input extrinsic to area I were not ruled out. Triplet recordings revealed that unilateral pairwise correlations were primarily independent. Correlation between unilateral pairs systematically decreased with increasing eye position, demonstrating that synchrony is not necessary for persistent activity at high firing rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.23-34-10852.2003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the oculomotor integrator, broad physiological and coarse anatomical evidence implicates recurrent excitatory interactions in generating attractor dynamics.

    “Within the oculomotor integrator, there is broad physiological18–20 and coarse anatomical21 evidence implicating recurrent excitatory interactions in generating attractor dynamics.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aksay, E., Baker, R., Seung, H. S., & Tank, D. W.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2003-11-26
Volume
23
Issue
34
Pages
10852-10858
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1804362150
Cited by
45
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
goldfish, persistent activity, fixation behavior
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain Stem, Eye Movements, Feedback, Fixation, Ocular, Goldfish, Nerve Net, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review