Cited by 68Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Action-specific value signals in reward-related regions of the human brain

Open access
FitzGerald, Thomas H. B., Friston, Karl J., Dolan, Raymond J.·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Estimating the value of potential actions is crucial for learning and adaptive behavior. We know little about how the human brain represents action-specific value outside of motor areas. This is, in part, due to a difficulty in detecting the neural correlates of value using conventional (region of interest) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analyses, due to a potential distributed representation of value. We address this limitation by applying a recently developed multivariate decoding method to high-resolution fMRI data in subjects performing an instrumental learning task. We found evidence for action-specific value signals in circumscribed regions, specifically ventromedial prefrontal cortex, putamen, thalamus, and insula cortex. In contrast, action-independent value signals were more widely represented across a large set of brain areas. Using multivariate Bayesian model comparison, we formally tested whether value-specific responses are spatially distributed or coherent. We found strong evidence that both action-specific and action-independent value signals are represented in a distributed fashion. Our results suggest that a surprisingly large number of classical reward-related areas contain distributed representations of action-specific values, representations that are likely to mediate between reward and adaptive behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3254-12.2012

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • vmPFC is likely to have a complex role in value representation, with evidence linking it to stimulus value, outcome value, and action value.

    “vmPFC is likely to have a complex role in value representation and there is strong evidence linking this region to both stimulus value and outcome value, and even recent evidence linking it to action value (FitzGerald et al., 2012).”

    From Goals and Habits in the Brain (2013) · cites this paper as FitzGerald et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FitzGerald, T. H. B., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
FitzGerald, Thomas H. B.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-11-14
Volume
32
Issue
46
Pages
16417-16423
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2052480631
Cited by
68
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (091593, 078865/Z/05/Z, 078865, 098362, 999998, 091593/Z/10/Z, 088130)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
value representation, reward processing, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, putamen, thalamus, insula cortex, operant conditioning, multivariate decoding, Bayesian model selection, distributed neural representation, human brain
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Behavior, Brain, Cues, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Multivariate Analysis, Neostriatum, Prefrontal Cortex, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review