Cited by 833Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation

Open access
Mazzoni, Pietro, Krakauer, John W.·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The relationship between implicit and explicit processes during motor learning, and for visuomotor adaptation in particular, is poorly understood. We set up a conflict between implicit and explicit processes by instructing subjects to counter a visuomotor rotation using a cognitive strategy in a pointing task. Specifically, they were told the exact nature of the directional perturbation, a rotation that directed them 45 degrees counterclockwise from the desired target, and they were instructed to counter it by aiming for the neighboring clockwise target, 45 degrees away. Subjects were initially successful in completely negating the rotation with this strategy. Surprisingly, however, they were unable to sustain explicit control and made increasingly large errors to the desired target. The cognitive strategy failed because subjects simultaneously adapted unconsciously to the rotation to the neighboring target. Notably, the rate of implicit adaptation to the neighboring target was not significantly different from rotation adaptation in the absence of an opposing explicit strategy. These results indicate that explicit strategies cannot substitute for implicit adaptation to a visuomotor rotation and are in fact overridden by the motor planning system. This suggests that the motor system requires that planned and executed trajectories remain congruous in visual space, and enforces this correspondence even at the expense of an opposing explicit task goal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5317-05.2006

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a reaching task with a constant angular visuomotor rotation, an explicit strategy instructed in the second trial immediately restored task performance by minimizing end-point errors.

    “In the second trial after introducing this visuomotor rotation, the subjects were instructed to change the aim of the movement to compensate for the visual perturbation. This explicit strategy immediately restored task performance by minimizing the end-point errors, defined as the angular distance between target and cursor.”

    From Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors (2019) · cites this paper as Mazzoni and Krakauer, 2006

    In “Subjects failed to counter the rotation adaptation with an explicit strategy” (page unavailable), the strategy immediately reduced errors to near zero, but subjects were instructed only after two movements with the rotation, not in the second trial. The same section reports that errors subsequently increased, so the restored performance was temporary. “Data analysis” (page unavailable) defines the measured directional error using target and hand directions, rather than target and cursor directions. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Visuomotor adaptation of reaching movement is a form of implicit motor learning that relies on the updating of a forward model through sensory prediction error.

    “Visuomotor adaptation of reaching movement is a form of implicit motor learning that relies on the updating of a forward model through sensory prediction error (sPE).”

    From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Mazzoni and Krakauer, 2006

    The Introduction calls adaptation to visuomotor rotation a form of implicit motor learning. The Discussion proposes that a mismatch between a forward model’s predicted trajectory and visual feedback drives implicit adaptation, but it does not say that adaptation updates the forward model itself. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In subsequent trials after an explicit strategy, end-point errors gradually increased, reflecting normal motor adaptation during visuomotor rotation.

    “However, in subsequent trials end-point errors gradually increased, reflecting the normal motor adaptation that occurs during visuomotor rotation (Mazzoni and Krakauer, 2006; Figure 1B).”

    From Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors (2019) · cites this paper as Mazzoni and Krakauer, 2006

  • Adaptation is an automatic, obligate, perhaps reward-indifferent, cerebellar-based learning process.

    “It appears, therefore, that adaptation is “automatic” – it is an obligate, perhaps reward-indifferent (Mazzoni and Krakauer, 2006), cerebellar-based (Martin et al., 1996a, b; Smith and Shadmehr, 2005; Tseng et al., 2007) learning process that will attempt to”
  • Adaptation to rotation occurs despite conflicting with explicit task goals.

    “For example, in a previous study we showed that adaptation to rotation occurs despite conflicting with explicit task goals (Mazzoni and Krakauer, 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazzoni, P., & Krakauer, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-04-05
Volume
26
Issue
14
Pages
3642-3645
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2016154932
Cited by
833
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 28
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K02NS048099)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
visuomotor adaptation, implicit motor learning, explicit strategies, motor planning, visuomotor rotation, pointing task, motor control
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Cognition, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Movement, Neuronal Plasticity, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review