Cited by 247Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMotor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Contribution of night and day sleep vs. simple passage of time to the consolidation of motor sequence and visuomotor adaptation learning

Open access
Doyon, Julien, Korman, Maria, Morin, Amélie, Dostie, Valérie, Tahar, Abdallah Hadj, Benali, Habib, Karni, Avi, Ungerleider, Leslie G. +1 more·2009·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

There is increasing evidence supporting the notion that the contribution of sleep to consolidation of motor skills depends on the nature of the task used in practice. We compared the role of three post-training conditions in the expression of delayed gains on two different motor skill learning tasks: finger tapping sequence learning (FTSL) and visuomotor adaptation (VMA). Subjects in the DaySleep and ImmDaySleep conditions were trained in the morning and at noon, respectively, afforded a 90-min nap early in the afternoon and were re-tested 12 h post-training. In the NightSleep condition, subjects were trained in the evening on either of the two learning paradigms and re-tested 12 h later following sleep, while subjects in the NoSleep condition underwent their training session in the morning and were re-tested 12 h later without any intervening sleep. The results of the FTSL task revealed that post-training sleep (day-time nap or night-time sleep) significantly promoted the expression of delayed gains at 12 h post-training, especially if sleep was afforded immediately after training. In the VMA task, however, there were no significant differences in the gains expressed at 12 h post-training in the three conditions. These findings suggest that "off-line" performance gains reflecting consolidation processes in the FTSL task benefit from sleep, even a short nap, while the simple passage of time is as effective as time in sleep for consolidation of VMA to occur. They also imply that procedural memory consolidation processes differ depending on the nature of task demands.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-009-1748-y

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans there is evidence of task-dependency when it comes to whether sleep improves learning: for adult humans, perceptual tasks showed little to no learning increase from sleep whereas cognitive tasks showed significant gains.

    “For adult humans, perceptual tasks showed little to no learning increase from sleep wherein cognitive tasks showed significant gains from learning.133”

    From The overfitted brain: Dreams evolved to assist generalization (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Discussion reports sleep-dependent gains for finger-tapping sequence learning but no significant difference between sleep and wakefulness for visuomotor adaptation. It describes the latter as having a strong perceptual component and the former as involving explicit knowledge. The claim extends this contrast between two motor tasks to perceptual and cognitive tasks generally; the paper does not establish that broader comparison. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doyon, J., Korman, M., Morin, A., Dostie, V., Tahar, A. H., Benali, H., Karni, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Carrier, J.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Doyon, Julien
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2009-03-11
Volume
195
Issue
1
Pages
15-26
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2011028534
Cited by
247
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Institute of Mental Health (Z01MH002035)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
sleep-dependent memory consolidation, motor skill learning, visuomotor adaptation, NAP, time of day, procedural memory
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Motor Skills, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Retention, Psychology, Sleep, Time Factors, Visual Perception, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review