Cited by 191Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Beyond working memory: the role of persistent activity in decision making

Open access
Curtis, Clayton E., Lee, Daeyeol·2010·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Since its first discovery in the prefrontal cortex, persistent activity during the interval between a transient sensory stimulus and a subsequent behavioral response has been identified in many cortical and subcortical areas. Such persistent activity is thought to reflect the maintenance of working memory representations that bridge past events with future contingent plans. Indeed, the term persistent activity is sometimes used interchangeably with working memory. In this review, we argue that persistent activity observed broadly across many cortical and subcortical areas reflects not only working memory maintenance, but also a variety of other cognitive processes, including perceptual and reward-based decision making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.006

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Memory traces in neural signals are mixed with other task-dependent factors.

    “Memory traces in the neural signals are mixed with other task-dependent factors44,45, and it has been debated whether other processes involved in goal-directed behavior could be mistakenly identified as memory, such as spatial attention46, motor planning47, anticipation of future events48, or timing49.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Baddeley A 1986 Working Memory Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curtis, C. E., & Lee, D.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
216-222
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112480903
Cited by
191
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH05916, R01MH059216)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (RL1DA024855)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY016407)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS048328, P05-NS048328)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
persistent activity, working memory, decision-making, perceptual decision making, reward-based decision-making, prefrontal cortex
MeSH terms
Brain, Decision Making, Humans, Learning, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review