Cited by 385Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionCognitive Abilities and Testing

The relationship between working memory storage and elevated activity as measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging

Open access
Riggall, Adam C., Postle, Bradley R.·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Does the sustained, elevated neural activity observed during working memory tasks reflect the short-term retention of information? Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of delayed recognition of visual motion in human participants were analyzed with two methods: a general linear model (GLM) and multivoxel pattern analysis. Although the GLM identified sustained, elevated delay-period activity in superior and lateral frontal cortex and in intraparietal sulcus, pattern classifiers were unable to recover trial-specific stimulus information from these delay-active regions. The converse-no sustained, elevated delay-period activity but successful classification of trial-specific stimulus information-was true of posterior visual regions, including area MT+ (which contains both middle temporal area and medial superior temporal area) and calcarine and pericalcarine cortex. In contrast to stimulus information, pattern classifiers were able to extract trial-specific task instruction-related information from frontal and parietal areas showing elevated delay-period activity. Thus, the elevated delay-period activity that is measured with fMRI may reflect processes other than the storage, per se, of trial-specific stimulus information. It may be that the short-term storage of stimulus information is represented in patterns of (statistically) "subthreshold" activity distributed across regions of low-level sensory cortex that univariate methods cannot detect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1892-12.2012

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frontoparietal regions create flexible stimulus representations that are in line with behavioral goals.

    “Together, these results suggest complementary roles for early visual cortex and frontoparietal regions [30][31][32], whereby frontoparietal regions create flexible stimulus representations that are in line with behavioral goals [3,33].”
  • We and others did not find reliable encoding of stimulus-related information in nonvisual areas (prefrontal and parietal cortex) when training on perceptual input.

    “Although we observed strong increases in activity in a specific set of regions in prefrontal and parietal cortex [28], we and others [3] did not find reliable encoding of stimulus-related information in these areas when training on perceptual input.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Postle BR Vandierendonck A Szmalec A What underlies the ability go guide action with spatial information that is no longer present in the environment? Spatial Working Memory 2011 897 901 Psychology Press Hove, UK

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riggall, A. C., & Postle, B. R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-09-19
Volume
32
Issue
38
Pages
12990-12998
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1965367003
Cited by
385
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH064498)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
working memory, sustained neural activity, delay-period activity, multi-voxel pattern analysis, general linear model, MT, intraparietal sulcus, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, subthreshold activity
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Motion Perception, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review